Frank von Hippel is the author, with Masafumi Takubo and Jungmin Kang, of the new book Plutonium: How Nuclear Power's Dream Fuel Became a Nightmare. He is a senior research physicist and professor of public and international affairs, emeritus, at Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School.
Q: Why did you and your colleagues decide to write this book
about plutonium, and how did the three of you collaborate on the project?
A: I have been involved in the plutonium issue since
1974, after India detonated a “peaceful nuclear explosive” with plutonium
extracted from the fuel of a “research” reactor with the assistance of the U.S.
Atomic Energy Commission for India’s plutonium breeder reactor program.
I began by arguing for the shutdown of the U.S. breeder
reactor program as uneconomic, unnecessary, and facilitating nuclear-weapon
proliferation. My Japanese and South Korean coauthors became engaged
because they had the same perceptions about Japan’s breeder program, which the
nuclear-energy establishment in South Korea would like to emulate.
Q: The book's subtitle is "How Nuclear Power's Dream
Fuel Became a Nightmare." What were the initial perceptions of plutonium,
and how did those perceptions shift?
A: The initial perception was that nuclear power could
replace polluting coal-fired power plants but that it could not reach that
potential if fueled, as current water-cooled reactors are, by the
chain-reacting isotope uranium-235, which constitutes only 0.7 percent of
natural uranium.
A plutonium breeder reactor could increase the resource base
greatly by converting uranium-238, which constitutes the other 99.3 percent of
natural uranium, into chain-reacting plutonium.
But it turned out that there is much more high-grade uranium
ore than people thought and global nuclear-power capacity stopped growing after
the Chernobyl accident. Uranium declined in cost and the economics of nuclear
power has been determined by the capital costs of nuclear power plants, which
have been rising because of safety concerns.
Q: What do you see as plutonium's role today, and what do
you see looking ahead?
A: Plutonium remains a nuclear-weapon material but is not
economic as a fuel. France and Japan have both abandoned breeder reactors but
still separate plutonium and recycle to fuel up to 10 percent of their nuclear
capacity in efforts that cost 10 times more than the cost of the low-enriched
uranium (uranium enriched to a few percent in U-235) that they would otherwise
have used.
China, India, Russia. and Bill Gates are still funding
breeder reactor research, development and demonstration (RD&D) despite the
fact that, after 50 years and more than $100 billion, liquid-sodium-cooled
breeder reactors remain much more costly and less reliable than water-cooled
reactors.
Q: What are you working on now?
A: I am writing a follow-on report trying to explain why
these dangerous zombie plutonium programs persist and what we can do to
accelerate their ends. The breeder RD&D programs one can understand, as embedded
government-funded programs like the U.S. space station.
The persistence of the French and Japanese plutonium-recycle
programs is more difficult to understand.
I think that they persist in part
because of the economic importance of the spent fuel “reprocessing” plants with
their 5,000 well-paid employees to the poor rural areas where they are based
and, in the case of Japan, because of the leverage provided in its strategic
relationship with the United States by the nuclear-weapon option innate in its plutonium
program.
--Interview with Deborah Kalb
No comments:
Post a Comment