Thursday, July 16, 2026

Q&A with Lauren Acampora

  


 

 

Lauren Acampora is the author of the new linked story collection The Animal Room. Her other books include The Wonder Garden. She lives in Westchester County, New York. 

 

Q: What inspired you to write The Animal Room?

 

A: Ever since I was a child, I’ve been intrigued by animals and stories involving animals. I’m pulled in by newspaper articles and neighborhood reports about animals, whether the story of a police dog apprehending a fugitive, a bear getting into a birdfeeder, a safari-goer being trampled by an elephant, or red-tailed hawks nesting on the ledge of a Manhattan apartment building.

 

I’m fascinated by what these stories suggest about human nature—and humanity’s relationship with Nature. Taken together, they illustrate our deeply complicated, paradoxical, delicate, sometimes fraught co-existence with other species.

 

I’d long planned to write a collection of stories featuring human-animal relationships, mostly because I thought it would be fun to create characters involved in these kinds of situations.

 

There’s so much cognitive dissonance that arises from our varied relationships with animals. We cherish our pets as family members, while also living with the fact that scientific researchers carry out experiments on animals, including domestic ones.

 

So many complex questions arise from human-animal scenarios. Who are we within the natural world? How has humanity’s place changed, or not changed, over time? How much can it ever really change? We are biological, mortal beings, after all—animals ourselves—and other species are, in many ways, our mirrors.

 

Q: The author Mona Awad said of the book, “In this dazzling panoply of intersecting lives and stories, Acampora explores our relationship to the animal in all its forms and throws into profound relief our great and tragic humanity.” What do you think of that description?

 

A: Well, of course I love Mona’s wonderfully generous quote! And I think that the idea of our humanity being both great and tragic is spot on. We are a terminally confused species, too smart for our own good. The knowledge of our own mortality and our painful awareness of the passage of time really messes us up.

 

This is a critical difference between us and our fellow animals who live moment to moment. Being human is a gift, yes, but also by definition a tragedy.

 

Q: Why did you decide to return to your fictional town of Old Cranbury, Connecticut, in this book?

 

A: At first, only one of the stories, “Dominion,” was meant to be set in Old Cranbury. I wanted to write a story from the perspective of Roy Fox, the retired oil CEO with an exotic animal estate, who features in my book The Hundred Waters, which is set in the Nearwater area of Old Cranbury.

 

In that novel, Roy is an opaque character, a bit of a cartoon villain in others’ eyes. I wanted to give him a chance to show his good (if sometimes misguided) intentions.

 

After finishing that story, I thought it would be fun to loop in some of my other characters from my first linked collection, The Wonder Garden. Once I had the idea of connecting these stories with previous books, I started connecting them with each other and couldn’t stop.

 

I do love a linked story collection, especially those that include characters from an author’s previous books. As a reader, I enjoy discovering Easter eggs, and so I included some for the readers of my other books, who will encounter familiar friends and incidents. That’s how all the stories ended up in Old Cranbury. I seem to keep coming back there.

 

Q: How was the book’s title chosen, and what does it signify for you?

 

A: When we moved into our house 17 years ago, we took ownership from a couple who’d lived here for 40 years and raised two daughters to adulthood. I chose one of the girls’ old bedrooms as my writing office.

 

While putting things away in the bedroom closet, I found taped to the far inside wall an old green construction paper sign with purple cut-out letters spelling “ANIMAL ROOM.” I picture a little girl’s stuffed animals arranged in the closet, maybe—but who knows?

 

I never took the sign down and never will. Those two words, “animal” and “room,” are so interesting together. Animals don’t belong in rooms. We put them there. We entrap them, rescue them, study them, admire them, and keep them close. I thought “The Animal Room” would make a great title for something someday.

 

And then I encountered those same words again while researching the story “Husbandry,” about an animal husbandry technician at a research institute. I learned that the rooms where laboratory animals are kept are called “animal rooms.”

 

Further researching that story, which has a strong neuroscience angle, I learned about the structure of the brain and its different compartments, so to speak. There are areas responsible for sophisticated reasoning and planning, and areas that are evolutionarily much older, which is where our instincts, intuitions, and self-protective, propagating drives come from.

 

I imagined this primitive compartment of our brains as a kind of “animal room,” where our deepest animal selves and urges are kept and which secretly drives our desires and purposes.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: I’ve been taking notes for years on a novel that may or may not expand upon this world I’ve been building and may or may not bring all four of my books together.

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: My dog Auggie was a major contributor to this book, just by napping on the guest bed near my desk. He provided companionship and inspiration and forced me to take mandatory breaks. While walking him, I thought through many of the ideas and problems in the book.

 

Also, being near Auggie activates the special energy that exists between humans and animals who share time on Earth. We’re drawn to animals for good reason. And being in his company reminds me that creatures of all species are deserving of respect, compassion, and dignity.

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb. Here's a previous Q&A with Lauren Acampora. 

Q&A with Bryan Gruley

  


 

 

Bryan Gruley is the author of the new novel River Deep. His other books include the novel Bitterfrost. He is also a journalist, and he lives in Michigan. 

 

Q: River Deep is your second novel featuring your characters Devyn Payne and Detective Garth Klimmek--do you think they have changed at all from one book to the next?

 

A: Absolutely. Devyn is coming off a failed experiment with living downstate and has crossed the courtroom aisle by signing up with prosecutor's office. And she's considering whether Jimmy Baker is a long-term relationship, or not.

 

Klimmek is looking forward to retirement and replacement surgery for his aching hip when this double-murder case is dropped in his lap. They will both have difficult choices to make throughout the book. 

 

Q: What inspired the plot of River Deep?

 

A: A 1989 case in which a man named Larry DeLisle drove his wife and four young children into the Detroit River. He supposedly confessed in a grueling police interrogation and for the past 20-some years has been appealing to have his life conviction overturned.

 

His appellate briefs served up some great material for the interrogation of Catriona Dulaney and the courtroom scenes in River Deep.

 

Q: The author Danielle Girard said of the book, “Haunting and morally complex, River Deep asks how well we ever truly know the people we love.” What do you think of that description?

 

A: It's certainly haunting, given that the inciting incident is the drowning of two infants. And I always strive for the morally complex, because that's how humans are. The knowing or not knowing of people--from Devyn to Jimmy to Klimmek to Catriona to the enigmatic, one-eyed stranger Hooper--is vital throughout.

 

Q: The novel is set in a small town in northern Michigan--how important is setting to you in your writing?

 

A: It's crucial. I try to make the setting, whether it's Bitterfrost, Starvation Lake, or Bleak Harbor, a character unto itself. Readers seem to think I succeed at that.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: I'm about halfway through a draft of the third Bitterfrost book, tentatively titled Savage Falls. It's a mess!

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: I really love hearing from readers, whether it's via my website or social media channels--and not just readers who like my books. I welcome constructive criticism (and sometimes nasty review quotes wind up on T-shirts!). Thanks for the great questions, Deborah!

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb. Here's a previous Q&A with Bryan Gruley. 

Q&A with Bill Smoot

  


 

 

Bill Smoot is the author of the new novel San Quentin Exodus. He is also an educator, and he has taught college courses at Mount Tamalpais College in San Quentin Prison for 14 years. He lives in Berkeley, California. 

 

Q: How much did your own experiences teaching at San Quentin Prison influence the writing of your new novel?

 

A: Very much. The setting, the daily realities, the experience of incarcerated people—all of these became raw material for my novel. However, the characters are completely fictional. None of them are based on real people.

 

Q: How did you create your characters James and Allison?

 

A: Over the years, when I entered the prison, I found myself gazing up at the imposing walls and wondering how one might escape. The character of Allison grew out of that wondering. She was a mystery solver in the vein of Nancy Drew, her childhood hero, and she wondered how one could fashion a key for this most formidable of locks.

 

As for James, he came out of my realization that one could be an archetypal “good boy” and still stumble into committing a serious crime. That’s the contradiction he lives—a good boy who did a bad thing.

 

I know this may sound strange, but I developed these characters by putting myself in a receptive state of mind and letting them come to me. They felt more dreamed than rationally constructed. I felt like I watched them live and then wrote down what I saw.

 

Q: The author Lori Ostlund said of the book, “Like all good literature, San Quentin Exodus ultimately asks us to reconsider everything we believe—or think we believe.” What do you think of that assessment?

 

A: I think it’s an accurate assessment. Of course, this will vary from reader to reader, but I think most people have a brutal and dehumanized image of incarcerated individuals that they have formed from TV, film, and works of fiction.

 

I believe my novel challenges that view and reveals the hearts and souls of people in prison. Teaching there for 14 years allowed me to appreciate their fierce humanity. As absurd as this might sound coming from a middle-class man with a Ph.D., I realized that in some deep way, we are all the same person.

 

Q: What do you hope readers take away from the book?

 

A: First, I hope they will be caught up in the journey of some very interesting and very likeable—even loveable—characters. Beyond that, I want them to feel the souls and hearts of those who are incarcerated. It’s often said that fiction can develop empathy in readers. I hope that’s what San Quentin Exodus will do.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: I have recently finished a new novel, tentatively called Looking to Eleusis, about a classics professor obsessed with the Eleusinian mystery religion of ancient Greece. In 1968, He goes to Greece to work on the excavation at Eleusis during the reign of the military junta and gets caught up in the resistance movement.

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: To my great distress, someone in the California prison bureaucracy heard about my novel and raised a stink—without having read it, of course. The college program in which I have taught for 14 years responded by throwing me under the bus, and I was fired (if “fired” is the right word for losing an unpaid job).

 

This is an act of violence—against the new California Model of prison as rehabilitative, against the ideals of freedom of expression, and against the students, who deserve professors who have the guarantee of freedom that all professors do—or should—enjoy.

 

I still hope this ham-fisted response will be reversed.

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb 

Q&A with Catherine Meeks

  


 

 

Catherine Meeks is the author of the new book Bridging the Rivers of Difference: A Proclamation of Unity in Resistance. Her other books include The Night Is Long But Light Comes in the Morning. She is an educator and is the former director of the Absalom Jones Center for Racial Healing, and she lives in Atlanta. 

 

Q: What inspired you to write Bridging the Rivers of Difference?

A: I have spent the past 50 years working as a professor, consultant, workshop presenter, and consistent advocate for racial justice and healing. I am thankful for the progress that we have made, but it is far too small considering the amount of resources and other efforts that have gone into attempting to dismantle system racism.

 

It is quite clear to me that the time has come to seek new ways to address this system that continues to support the disenfranchisement of people of color in the United States.

 

I am convinced that we have to reimagine the way ahead for this work and seek new ways to build coalitions between the major marginalized groups of people of color which can lead to the development of a system that is truly designed to include everyone living in the United States as free and equal humans. 

 

Q: What impact do you see the current administration having on social justice issues?

 

A: The Trump administration is interested in having a white America and it is about 400 years too late to achieve that desire.

 

But the systematic efforts that it is following, which have been designed by the Heritage Foundation and Stephen Miller, are serving to continue to make space for division and competition among people of color and white people as well.

 

The disparagement of Latinos in particular and other groups of people of color, which is leading to serious acts of violence from ICE and others who believe their racist views to be valid, is heartbreaking. The effort to destabilize democratic principles such as free speech, voting rights, and justice support their intentions as well.

 

All of these behaviors are contributing to making divisiveness and mistrust more powerful.

 

Q: Your book calls for unity--what do you see as some of the encouraging and discouraging factors in achieving that goal?

 

A: The call to unity in my book is a bold move indeed, given the amount of diversity that exist in the United States and the historical journey that the major minority groups have traveled. That path has led to the place of creating a spirit of competition instead of one of coalition and community building.

 

The reality of this situation is challenging, but it is not impossible to change the narrative if enough of us can decide that a new way is possible.

 

The book addresses a possible path to follow in the last chapters in the discussion about a way forward that involves the major minority groups looking to the stories and wisdom from their ancestors to help in creating a new narrative that does not include the white supremacist narrative that has infected all of them.

 

These groups need to work to remember or to learn about their ancient past before they became engaged with white supremacy and its control. They need to work to see themselves as fellow humans with a common struggle.

 

There are people other than me who understand that people of color have to take up this work of resistance and seek ways to create a common agenda that is designed to benefit everyone.

 

There are a few examples of coalition building in the racial healing community, but much remains to be done in this regard because it is hard to sustain the fragile coalitions that form in the present moment.

 

I am not discouraged about the way ahead; I simply understand that the work of creating the type of unity that I am imagining will take a fair amount of time and serious commitment from people who are intentional about working for the change that is required for us to build a world where everyone is seen as a worthy human.

 

Q: What do you hope readers take away from your book?

A: I hope that readers will be challenged to examine their personal thoughts about racial healing and wellness in an honest manner and think about what, if any, role they wish to assume in helping to create new narratives about racial healing and justice in the United States.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: I am creating a series of interviews in what I am calling Wisdom Bearers. These are interviews with people 65 years and older about their life journeys and these interviews will be used to help in fostering the intergenerational work that I am doing.

 

I think that dialogue between the generations is crucial and this work is designed to help promote that effort. The interviews will be housed at my website and available for anyone to see and to use to help facilitate intergenerational conversations and relationship-building activities.

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: I would enjoy having your audience visit and subscribe to my website www.turquoiseandlavender.com and some might be interested in my book Light Comes in the Morning, Meditations on Racial Healing as well as my Bridging The Rivers Of Difference, A Proclamation of Unity In Resistance.

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb 

Q&A with Ros Hill

  


 

 

Ros Hill is the author of the new novel Sketch. His other books include Taking Out the Trash. He lives in San Marcos, Texas.

 

Q: What inspired you to create Sketch?

 

A: I came across a short passage in the book Station Eleven, by Emily St. John Mandel, that referred to the words sketchbook and comic-book. I imagined a boy sitting at his bedroom desk, drawing a superhero. I thought, as the boy went to bed, what if the superhero came to life in his bedroom straight off the page? That was the seed that sprouted the idea of Sketch.

 

Q: Why did you choose Egypt as the story's location?

 

A: I researched where some of the earliest drawings originated and the ancient Egyptians’ use of papyrus paper caught my attention. When I thought about how they might’ve made their own ink, I began to wonder what if the sun god Ra anointed it, making it magical? The setting in Egypt evoked a mythological feel that worked well with the book’s opening scene.

 

Q: Did you know how the novel would end before you started writing it, or did you make many changes along the way?

 

A: It wasn’t until I figured out how the Finger Gunman (supervillain) was to be created, that I began to rough draft the book’s ending. I actually had a few different ideas. Then, as I began writing the final chapters, an idea struck me, and I knew I had nailed it.

 

Q: What do you hope readers take away from the book?

 

A: I hope they find themselves thinking, Now that was an original superhero story! I hope they enjoy reading it as much as I enjoyed writing it. And I hope they wonder if there’s a sequel.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: I’m writing the sequel! I’m currently 24 chapters into it. It’s a completely different story with a great new cast of characters (and some returning characters, of course). I’d love to leak the title, but it’s all under lock and key.

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: Yes. I wrote the entirety of Sketch with my right thumb, using the Notes app on my iPhone. All 87,000 words. Its immediate accessibility and ease of typing made my writing process very convenient.

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb 

July 16

 


 

ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY

July 16, 1862: Ida B. Wells born. 

Wednesday, July 15, 2026

Q&A with Jurica Pavičić

  


 

 

Jurica Pavičić is the author of the novel Mother of Sorrows, now available in an English-language translation by Matt Robinson. Pavičić's other books include Red Water. Also a journalist and a screenwriter, he lives in Split, Croatia. 

 

Q: What inspired you to write Mother of Sorrows?

 

A: In 2012 a young Mexican tourist was found dead, slaughtered in a recreational park forest in Split, the city where I live.

 

A couple of days later the police published a photo of an AC Milan soccer T-shirt which they believed - and it turned out to be true  - belonged to the murderer.

 

I was watching a photo of a soccer shirt published in a newspaper, and my sudden thought was: what if I recognized the T-shirt, and knew it belonged to my son? That was the beginning.

 

Of course, I didn't want a documentary novel. Instead of a tourist, I opted for a local girl, the daughter of an influential elite, instead of a mother I wrote about two women (a mother and sister). Even the AC Milan shirt became an FC Barcelona jacket.

 

But my initial core - someone seeing an object in the news and recognizing it - is still there as a scene in the novel.

 

Q: How did you create your characters Zvone, Ines, and Katja?

 

A: I started Mother of Sorrows as a novel about the mother. I soon realized that it didn’t work, it would be too dry and one-dimensional.

 

So, I introduced a mother and sister/daughter which are opposites. The mother is working class, not very clever, and religious. The daughter is more broad-minded, modern, a middle-class professional.

 

But the most important division in the novel is ideological. It's the ideological choice between loyalty to a family, blood, and tribe, and loyalty to principles and law.

 

Everywhere - and especially in the Balkans - that divide is a clue. It may be only a relevant ideological divide, far more relevant then classic left and right. It's also a crucial topic of many great crime novels I know, for instance, Dennis Lehane's Mystic River or Small Mercies.  

 

Q: The Publishers Weekly review of the novel says, “Pavičić is far more concerned with the story's emotional stakes, which he renders convincingly enough to move even the hardest hearts.” What do you think of that description?

 

A: Well, I love it. But I hope the reader won't misunderstand it. Mother of Sorrows is still a thriller. I wanted it to be a page-turner. I want people to rush toward the end, wondering what's going to happen next. That old-fashioned genre pleasure has got to be there, merged with psychology and emotional drama.

 

Q: Can you say more about what you hope readers take away from the novel?

 

A: Like I said, I want my books to be thrilling, to give genre pleasure. At the same time, I try to drive my readers into a hostage situation, I want them to identify with characters which would take them somewhere where they might not want to be, to support them while they do things which would otherwise condemn.

 

Also, I want foreign readers to get the idea about my society and culture, which is Mediterranean, a southern society in a tourist-driven, post-industrial, post-Yugoslav war, late capitalism.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: I finished a book last week; it will be out in November. The title is Atentator (translated Assassin). It starts with a murder of a murky mid-level politician who is killed by an assassin on an electric bike.

 

I follow several characters: murderer, police inspector in charge, daughter of the politician, and an older lady from the secluded island who realized that a guest in her apartment house could be a murderer.

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: There is a lot of food in my novels because I like to cook. I also write short stories which are - at least I think so - quite good. Some of my favorite writers are short story writers: Flannery O'Connor, Raymond Carver, J.D. Salinger, and Borges.

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb. Here's a previous Q&A with Jurica Pavičić.