Linda J. Spielman is the author of the new book A Field Guide to Tracking Mammals in the Northeast. She is an environmental educator and expert on animal tracking, and she lives in upstate New York.
Q:
Why did you decide to write this guide to tracking animals, and how did you
decide on the animals to include?
A:
I do tracking workshops with participants from a variety of experience levels,
and I have often seen how frustrated people become when the tracks they’re
looking at don’t match the illustrations in their books.
Identifying
animal tracks can be difficult, because the same animal can make tracks that
vary greatly in appearance depending on how the animal was moving, what it
stepped on, and what happened after the tracks were made.
I
wanted a book that I could use as a resource in the field to help people in
these confusing situations. The book I envisioned would be portable but would cover
tracks in great detail, with lots of images showing not just “perfect” tracks
but also tracks that had missing parts or whose shapes differed from the
“normal” shapes.
There
are plenty of tracking books out there, and some (I’m thinking especially of
the ones by Paul Rezendes and Mark Elbroch) are excellent. But even these don’t
really deal with track variations in the depth that I wished for.
It’s
not that the authors don’t know about this—all experienced trackers accumulate
a kind of mental file cabinet full of track variations. It’s just that the
allocation of space to other kinds of information in these books simply didn’t
allow more coverage of track variations.
I
saw an unfilled niche, and (with support and encouragement from several of my
trusted mentors) I felt that I could make a book that addressed that need.
In
my 20-plus years of photographing tracks I had documented lots of confusing
variants, and I had been drawing tracks for nearly that long, so I felt
equipped to delve into the quagmire of animal track variation. The geographic coverage
was determined by my own tracking experience, which has been primarily in the
northeastern U.S.
All
of the northeastern mammals whose tracks are likely to be encountered appear in
the book, but I didn’t include a few mammals which appear only rarely on the
edges of the region.
Q:
Who do you see as the perfect reader of this book, and what do you hope your
readers take away from it?
A:
The perfect reader is someone who is drawn to animal tracks, who is curious
about the animals that live around us, and who is interested in what tracks can
tell us about the natural world.
Beginners
will get a jump start on looking more closely and gathering more information
from tracks. More experienced trackers will discover (or rediscover) important details
and perhaps embrace rather than resist the variation that makes tracking so
challenging and fascinating.
And
I hope that my book will contribute to an awareness of the beauty and
complexity of tracks for practitioners of all levels of experience.
Q:
What are a couple of your own most interesting moments as an animal tracker?
A:
One winter day I was snowshoeing with my dog, following a snowmobile trail
along a forest road. I was looking for tracks but not finding many.
We
went for about an hour and then turned around and went back the way we had
come. On the way back I was surprised to see a mink trail crossing ours. It
crossed my snowshoe tracks without a break in its rhythm, but at my dog’s
tracks its movements changed.
There
were mink tracks (at a walk rather than the usual bound) going both directions
along the dog’s trail. The mink had spent time investigating the dog’s tracks
before continuing in the same direction it had originally been going.
Apparently
people were no big deal to the mink, but the dog—which would have been less
predictable than people—was much more alarming.
On
another occasion I was following a path through a snow-covered meadow (the
snowpack was several feet deep) with a few other people. We found several places
where short-tailed weasel tracks crossed our trail.
Further
investigation showed that all of the tracks were actually parts of a single
trail made by one individual animal. The weasel trail coursed around and looped
back on itself, and at one point disappeared down a small hole into the
snowpack, only to reappear from another small hole nearby.
But
after its emergence the trail was different: the weasel tracks went deeper into
the snow and there were new marks alongside, slender lines that appeared at
regular intervals. This pattern led down a slope, plunged into a hole in a deep
snowdrift, and didn’t reappear anywhere in the vicinity.
What
we had found was the trail of a hunting weasel. The animal had, in typical
weasel fashion, bounded around making erratic turns and loops, listening and
watching for signs of prey animals. It had finally detected an animal (probably
a vole) beneath the snow, dived down, and emerged with the prey animal in its
jaws.
It
had then bounded down the slope holding its prize crosswise in its mouth, the
tail of the dead creature hitting the snow out to the side each time the weasel
landed. Where the trail went down into the snowdrift the weasel probably had
descended to a safe refuge where it could eat its meal in warmth and safety.
In
late winter I sometimes find the tracks of mated pairs of foxes or coyotes.
This is always a treat, because the tracks are so expressive of the bond
between the two animals. The trails may parallel each other or lie one on top
of the other, and they may diverge and come back together repeatedly.
Sometimes
the tracks show how one of the pair gets frisky and does some acrobatic moves,
and sometimes both animals engage in playful tussles. Either one may pause to
leave a scent mark (think of a dog and a fire hydrant), and sometimes the
tracks show that they were just standing close, perhaps nuzzling each other.
Q:
You write, “We were all trackers once,” and you note that “the pendulum now
swings back” toward more interest in tracking. What accounts for that increased
interest, and what do you see looking ahead?
A:
I think a number of factors have contributed to our increasing awareness of
tracking as an important skill. The birth (or really rebirth) of the environmental
movement is part of it, as well as our increasing need to escape to wild places
from lives hemmed in by technology, schedules, and stress.
Credit
should also be given to a few pivotal figures, among them Tom Brown and Louis
Leibenberg, who helped to bring tracking back into the cultural mainstream.
Q:
What are you working on now?
A:
With the appearance of my book, I’ve had many inquiries about tracking outings,
so I’ll be scheduling several in the next months.
I’m
also preparing a workshop on drawing and tracking (I’m calling it Draw Your Way
to Tracking Wisdom). I’ll be presenting it at the Northeast Wildlife Trackers
Conference in Massachusetts in October, and I’ll also be offering it to
bookstores, nature centers, and libraries.
Q:
Anything else we should know?
A:
Some of the publicity for my book has stated or implied that it is the only
book a person needs to become an accomplished tracker. That may be a good
selling point, but it isn’t true.
Anyone
who gets serious about tracking will want to know more about bites, chews, dens,
scat, kill sites, and other sign, and will turn to the much more complete
coverage and beautiful photographs in Paul Rezendes’ and Mark Elbroch’s books.
To
improve their understanding of animal gaits, trackers will want to refer to
books by Mark Elbroch, James Lowery, and David Moscowitz. For interpretation of
tracks and trails, books by James Lowery, Jon Young, and David Brown are
essential resources. And serious trackers will want to learn more about animal
ecology and wildlife biology by delving into the extensive literature in these
fields.
My
book is intended to fill a specific niche in the tracking literature: it is a
portable field guide that focuses primarily on tracks, with comprehensive
coverage in both text and images of a wide selection of track variants. I hope
it stands with the other books as an essential resource for aspiring and
experienced trackers.
--Interview with Deborah Kalb
No comments:
Post a Comment