Monday, April 21, 2025

Q&A with Gary Gabel

 


 

Gary Gabel is the author of The Constitution Kids, a new book for kids and young adults. His other books include Personal Takeover. Also an entrepreneur and speaker, he lives in Michigan.

 

Q: What inspired you to write The Constitution Kids?

 

A: I was inspired by the growing conversations about Constitutional rights in today’s world and the realization that many people, including younger generations, don’t fully understand what the Constitution actually says or means.

 

I wanted to create a way to make it approachable, exciting, and relevant for both young and old readers. By using relatable characters and adventurous storytelling, I hope to show that the Constitution isn’t just an old document— it’s a living part of our daily lives, and understanding it is essential for empowering the next generation of leaders.

 

Q: How did you create your characters Alex, Kali, and Roman?

 

A: The three 15-year-olds were created so that the story would remain accessible and entertaining. I wanted each teen to have a different personality—one that would complement the others—so Alex was drafted as the “communicator” in the group, Kali became the “intuitive empath,” and Roman became the “inventor.” 

 

These traits come out in various ways throughout The Constitution Kids, providing humor and empathy even in serious situations. The three teens serve as catalysts to turn the exploration of the Constitution into a magical experience.

 

Q: How did you choose the places and historical figures to highlight in the book?

 

A: Each historical figure was chosen because they represent a unique perspective on the Constitution and its impact over time. Figures like Ben Franklin, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Alice Paul embody different aspects of what it means to fight for justice and rights under the Constitution.  

 

Some of the locations were selected so that the reader could get an up-close picture of the places where key events actually happened. Other locations, like the Russian Gulag, were selected to help the reader see the contrast between what our Constitution provides for us versus the difficulty experienced by people in countries that do not have the protections the Constitution provides.


Q: Especially given the current political situation, what do you hope kids take away from the book?

 

A: I would hope both kids and adults who read The Constitution Kids will come away with an understanding of how important this document is to protecting our rights as citizens of the United States. I also hope it goes even further, inspiring the readers to stand up for the Constitution, since it is being challenged today from all quarters.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: My work is taking me in several directions right now.  First of all, I am busy promoting The Constitution Kids since I feel strongly that it can have a hugely positive effect on those who read it. 

 

Secondly, I am working with Union Mission in Savannah, Georgia.  Union Mission provides shelters for homeless men and women in the Savannah area, along with providing various tools to help them rise out of homelessness. 

 

They have been using one of my other books, Personal Takeover, a self-help book, in training programs designed to help their clients understand how the mindsets we hold about ourselves and the outside world affect our future. 

 

I am working with them on several programs to help participants understand their own “negathoughts,” (a term I coined). Negathoughts are thoughts we hold that totally disempower us. The program focuses on how they can “re-write” their negathoughts and shift any mindsets that may be holding them back.

 


Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: So far, I have received incredibly positive feedback on The Constitution Kids. Several reviewers have said, “This should be a Disney movie!” 

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb. This Q&A was conducted in partnership with Amplify Publishing Group. Enter this contest for a chance to win one of 10 copies of The Constitution Kids. Enter to bring this magical journey home!

Q&A with Katie Mazeika

 


 

Katie Mazeika is the author and illustrator of the new children's picture book Maybe Just Ask Me!. Her other books include Annette Feels Free. She lives in Ohio.

 

Q: Why did you decide to create Maybe Just Ask Me!?

A: When I was 3 years old, I had cancer and lost my right eye. I was in and out of hospitals for a number of years afterward. At one point, when I was 5, I spent almost six months in Cleveland Clinic to have several surgeries.

 

At that time, my favorite book was Madeline by Ludwig Bemelmans. It was the only book I knew with a character in the hospital. Not only was Madeline hospitalized, like I was, but she also had a scar. Madeline jumped up on her hospital bed and showed her scar off.

I wanted to be proud of my scars like Madeline. But I wasn’t. I was a shy kid who tried to hide my eyepatch behind sunglasses. Maybe Just Ask Me! is the book I needed as a kid. It acknowledges the stares and whispers that come with a physical disability.

 

But Mazie, the main character, isn’t embarrassed or ashamed. She gathers her courage,  speaks up, and tells her classmates: “Maybe just ask me!”

Q: The Kirkus Review of the book says, “...the bright, rounded illustrations sympathetically convey Mazie’s emotions, clearly depicting her sadness at her classmates’ rumors and her happiness when they befriend her after learning her story. A reminder that kids with disabilities are the authorities of their own stories.” What do you think of that description?

A: To be honest, I love it--especially that last line! This was an emotional book for me to write and illustrate. I reconnected with a lot of feelings from my childhood. I’m happy that all those emotions come through in art.

I’m particularly happy that Mazie’s spirit comes through. Hopefully, that spirit will encourage young readers to speak up for themselves.

Q: In a note at the back of the book, you write, “Because when we pretend not to see people with disabilities, we make them feel invisible.” Can you say more about that?

A: Absolutely! I understand that kids are often taught to not stare or talk about another person’s disability, that this is considered “good manners.” But kids are curious, and curiosity (with kindness) is allowed, as long as kids understand that not everyone wants to share their story.


When we teach kids to look away from someone with a disability, we teach kids that disabilities are scary or shameful. Instead, we should encourage kids to talk openly about differences. That’s how we learn we are all human.

Looking away from someone with a disability or trying to ignore them to “be polite” is excluding that person. And it’s important that kids don’t learn that it’s okay to exclude someone just because they’re different.

Q: What impact did it have on you to create this book, and what do you hope kids (and adults!) take away from it?

A: On the one hand, creating this book was very cathartic. It brought a lot of memories and emotions from my childhood to mind. It really helped me to process what it was like growing up with a disability.  I also loved creating the imaginations of the other kids!

I hope Mazie helps readers discover the courage to speak up and tell their own stories. I hope adults and young readers have honest discussions about disability and feel free to be curious and ask questions so they can see that there’s nothing shameful or scary about disability.

Q: What are you working on now?

A: I’m currently working on art for an informational fiction picture book (also written by me). The working title is House in a Box.  It’s about a boy who builds a Sears kit home with his family and new neighbors.

 

It’s very different from Maybe Just Ask Me. It has a historical setting and is filled with all kinds of little details about the kit homes from Sears. It will be out in 2026 with Beach Lane Books/Simon & Schuster.

Q: Anything else we should know?

A: I don’t just write and illustrate; I also present to educators on disability representation in children’s books.  And I love visiting schools and meeting young readers! You find me on Instagram at kdmazart, Bluesky at kdmaz, and my website: https://www.katiemazeika.com.

Thank you so much, Deborah!

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb. Here's a previous Q&A with Katie Mazeika.

Q&A with Lee Upton

 


 

 

Lee Upton is the author of the new novel Wrongful. Her many other books include the novel Tabitha, Get Up. She is the Francis A. March Professor Emerita and Writer in Residence at Lafayette College.

 

Q: In our previous interview, you said that the ideas for Wrongful and for your novel Tabitha, Get Up “both emerged from one failed short story I wrote.” Can you say more about that?

 

A: It’s so nice to be able to answer questions from you again. Thanks so much for this opportunity. Yes, both novels derived from one short story about a woman who went missing at a literary festival.

 

My 2024 comic novel, Tabitha, Get Up, emerged from an email that appears at the end of the story. The voice in that email had such infectious energy that I wanted to find a way to keep the voice alive in some form.

 

Wrongful, my new novel, derives from a portion of the plot of that failed story. As a short story, the original plot was too complicated and ended too abruptly. The plot brimmed over the top of the story.

 

Extending the plot was a challenge and an opportunity. Suddenly I found myself writing a mystery in which a number of writers behave badly. I had such fun thinking about all the temptations that the characters face. Soon, multiple mysterious events started blooming.

 

Wrongful is, in some ways, a homage to Agatha Christie. I turned to her novels during a hard time in my life. Focusing on her tricky plots helped me forget my own troubles. I hope Wrongful can do the same for others.

 

Q: The writer Olivia Clare Friedman said of the book, “I love Wrongful for its humor and wisdom, but also for the characters that keep you guessing.” What do you think of that description?

 

A: That’s a wonderful description, and I’m so grateful for it. I wanted the novel to contain notes of humor even though there are spikes of horror. The plot revolves around a mystery that a primary character, Geneva Finch, has been haunted by for 10 years. She recruits the aid of a former priest to determine what happened a decade ago.

 

In early drafts the characters kept me guessing too for a while. It was comforting to hear that Agatha Christie didn’t always know the identity of the culprit until later in the process. Once I figured a few crucial things out, it became especially exciting to reveal characters’ motivations.


Q: How was the book’s title chosen, and what do you hope readers take away from it?

 

A: The idea of being wrong was a motivating theme for the book. I’ve been humbled many times when I was sure I knew something—only to discover how wrong I was.

 

Mystery novels are about wrongness, in a sense. In a mystery novel if we’re not wrong much of the time as readers, suspense lags and the novel fails. We can allow ourselves to be misled by characters without doing damage to ourselves. There’s a kind of delicious excitement in that.

 

Characters get so much wrong in Wrongful. Some make errors because of envy or spite or projection—particularly when they assume others think the way they do.

 

Wrongful is also about readers and reading—the intimacy of reading, and the unique love that readers may feel for authors. (I began writing as a child out of love—love for words on the page and for all authors who opened the world for me.)

 

Q: How did you create your character Geneva?

 

A: I really enjoyed creating Geneva. She’s what I think of as an ideal reader. She immerses herself in novels, giving her full attention as she reads. At the same time, she has a capacity to “read” others in ways that might terrify them if they could hear her thoughts. She’s in some ways an innocent—but like many innocent people she tends often to feel guilty.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: I’m working on poetry and fiction and focusing intensively on one manuscript: a novel about two painters, one of whom believes the other painter ruined her life. The draft is giving me just about every kind of trouble.

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: In 2026 there will be a sequel to Tabitha, Get Up. It’s called Tabitha, Stay Up—and I had such a fabulous time returning to Tabitha’s world. The novel will be published by Sagging Meniscus Press. Tabitha’s world is turned upside down and jostled a bit. Sequels seem to require that sort of churning. Tabitha kept me laughing, I’ll say that.

 

Another novel—a very different novel (literary fiction that’s a thriller) is also appearing in 2026: The Withers, from Regal House Publishing. It’s a novel about friendship, obsession, profound loss, and the lure of forgetting—and it’s set in a world terrorized by organ traffickers. That sounds harrowing, and it is, but it’s also a novel about love.

 

Right now, I’m excited that Wrongful is coming into the world. It’s almost a taxonomy of the way writers and agents and publishers can be tempted to engage in ruinous behaviors.

 

But it’s also a jaunt, a tricky mystery that asks us to keep reconsidering what we believe to be true as it  explores questions about guilt and fear and envy, and how we can so easily come to the wrong conclusions—repeatedly.

 

Thanks for these great questions!

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb. Here's a previous Q&A with Lee Upton.

Q&A with Alexandra Gibson and Lauren Jordan

 

Jack Eisner, photo by Beth Sarafraz

 

 

 

Alexandra Gibson and Lauren Jordan are the granddaughters of the late Jack Eisner, whose memoir, The Survivor of the Holocaust, first published in 1980, has been re-released. Eisner (1925-2003) was a Holocaust survivor who came to the United States at age 22 and created a successful import-export company.

 

Q: Why is your grandfather’s memoir being re-released this year?

 

A: The passing down of stories is one of the most important elements of Jewish tradition. The Jewish people preserve our stories by telling and retelling them around the Passover table, as part of the synagogue service, and in Hebrew school. Now that we both have young daughters, we feel an acute responsibility to make sure our grandfather’s story lives on with this new generation. 

 

As more time passes since the Holocaust, and fewer survivors are alive to share their experiences firsthand, it’s natural that the younger generations are more emotionally disconnected from these events. At best, many young people are unfamiliar with the tragedy on a personal level, and at worst the world is becoming more and more antisemitic.

 

It is critical that the stories of those Jews be told and retold, if nothing else, to impress upon future generations the destructive power not merely of antisemitism but of human evil. 

 

Q: How much did you know about his experiences when you were children?

 

A: Long before we read his book, our grandfather filled our childhood with stories from his past nearly anytime we were together.

 

There’s the story of the miraculous reunion on a train platform in Germany, where our grandfather and his mother, each believing the other had perished in a concentration camp, were shocked to find each other alive.

 

Or, there’s the story about how he would enthusiastically raise his hand anytime a Nazi guard sought out a given skill set—carpenter, tailor, musician, builder—despite his inexperience, just to make himself indispensable and avoid death. 

 

He shared his stories most often at the dinner table surrounded by his family and friends. Each prayer or song would remind him of some part of his prewar life, his family’s experiences in the Warsaw Ghetto, or his liberation from the death march from Flossenburg (the last camp that he was in). The conversation would usually build to him sharing his beliefs in the role antisemitism plays in the past and present experience of the Jews. 

 

Q: The writer Irving Howe said of your grandfather’s book, “There is something overwhelming, indeed terrifying, in trying to respond to the experience of this Jewish boy, Jack Eisner, characterized by the insuppressible will to live.” What do you think of that description?

 

A: As a survivor, our grandfather carried the undeniable proof that self-determination could overcome unimaginable adversity. Although he did not believe that his survival meant that his will was stronger than those who did not survive, he continued to use that strength after the war to build a new family and life. 

 

Even at the very end, when he faced cancer, that same fighting spirit resurfaced. He didn't just accept the diagnosis; he prepared for battle. He spoke about fighting the illness the same way he fought the Nazis – with strategy, grit, and an almost unbelievable conviction that he could win again. He genuinely believed his will, the same will that got him through the camps, could conquer this final enemy. 

 

Q: Especially given the rise in antisemitism, what do you hope readers take away from the book?

 

A: Regrettably, the retelling of this story is more urgent today than at perhaps any other time since World War II. As granddaughters of two survivors, we often find ourselves exchanging horrifying headlines, feeling a sense of helplessness in the face of a total lack of Holocaust education among younger generations.

 

In February 2024, the Anti-Defamation League published the results of a survey on antisemitic attitudes in the United States. The survey results are disheartening: of the 4,143 Americans surveyed, the youngest cohorts among them show the highest rates of antisemitic prejudice.

 

It's unfathomable to read that 60 percent of Gen Z believe in Holocaust conspiracy theories, or that there has been a staggering 1,100 percent increase in antisemitism across the globe in just the past year. 

 

As recent history’s most horrific example of anti-Jewish hostility (and those who survived it) recede further from memory, all that remains will be their stories. They're not just tales of the past; they're stark reminders of the very real atrocities that occurred, urging younger generations to confront history's truths and prevent such horrors from happening again.

 

Q: What do you see as your grandfather’s legacy today?

 

A: In his later life, our grandfather directed his energy towards his ultimate mission: educate the next generation and ensure that the horrors of the Holocaust would never be forgotten or repeated.

 

In addition to writing his memoir, he adapted his story into both a Broadway play and motion picture film. He helped found the Warsaw Ghetto Resistance Organization, one of the first Holocaust survivors’ groups, established the Holocaust Survivors Memorial Foundation, and donated to universities in an effort to educate the next generation about the Holocaust and antisemitism.

 

To commemorate the 1.5 million Jewish children murdered by Nazis, he installed a memorial at the Jewish cemetery in Warsaw. Furthermore, he helped to organize the first concert at the Vatican with Pope John Paul II and the Chief Rabbi of Rome to honor the victims of the Holocaust.

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb

Q&A with Michelle Lerner

 


 

 

Michelle Lerner is the author of the new novel Ring. She also has written the poetry chapbook Protection. She lives in New Jersey.

 

Q: What inspired you to write Ring, and how did you create your character Lee?

 

A: Ring was in part inspired by my experience with complicated grief when I was younger. I wanted to write a story about a person struggling so much with grief that they consider ending their own life, because that feeling/desire is a common facet of complicated grief.

 

In addition, I've been struggling with chronic illness for the past decade, triggered by a too-long-undiagnosed case of neurological Lyme Disease. Earlier in my illness, I experienced a profound sense of physical and social isolation due to being sick.

 

I also discovered, in my attempts to recover from my illness, a range of healing modalities that calm the nervous system and release trauma stored in the body. I wanted to write about all of these things.

 

And since I mostly wrote the book during the pandemic, that deeply influenced my desire to write about isolation, despair, and the process of re-entering the world.

 

In some ways, the character of Lee came to me fully formed. As with many fiction writers, I feel like I "see" characters more than create them. They tend to appear fully formed in my mind, and writing about them feels like channeling what they tell me about themselves.

 

That said, I think the way that Lee appeared to me was heavily influenced by Tig Notaro's largely autobiographical character in her series One Mississippi, who responded to the traumas of grief, alienation, and illness with a combination of resignation, repression, recognition of aburdity, quiet wry humor, and some willingness to learn and change.

 

Lee is not that character, but I think that character helped give birth to Lee in my mind and heavily influenced Lee's responses to their surroundings. 

 

Lee is also experiencing severe depression, and having experienced that state myself, I was able to describe it with some clarity. But depression is an emotional state and not a character trait; it was important to me that the progression of the story tease this out to some degree.

 

In developing the actual character of Lee, I tried to understand a kind of emotional repression that I've witnessed and that I think is common in certain elements of American culture; it's a bit foreign to me as an Ashkenazi Jew but I've spent a lot of time contending with it in people I'm close to.

 

Lee's somewhat blunt communication style and tendency toward judgment, on the other hand, is more reflective of my own personality, and that the way wrote those traits reflects my ambivalence and concerns about how they play out in my own life.

 

Q: How was the novel’s title chosen, and what does it signify for you?

 

A: Ring is the name of the dog in the story, who is a character himself but who also triggers conflict and growth for the main character.

 

Ring's name symbolizes something central to the story. In group meditations, the person leading the meditation will often ring a small bell to start and finish the meditation practice, and sometimes in the middle of the practice. This happens in a scene in the book.

 

Part of the point of the bell is to bring us to our senses and the present moment, to remind us of why we are here, and to help focus on our breath or whatever other point of focus we’re utilizing to try to stay present.

 

The bell is supposed to pull us out of the stories we're telling ourselves in our minds and back to what we can actually feel in our bodies, our breath, and the space immediately around us in this moment.

 

I think Ring as a character does this for Lee, brings them back to the present moment and the realization of being a living being in the world, and also to the decisions and commitments that come with that realization.

 

Q: The novel is set in a remote part of northern Canada--how important is setting to you in your writing?

 

A: The setting in this book was extremely important to the story, and I do not only mean regarding its plot. The story did need to take place in a remote northern area in order for the plot to work, and some of the subplots are directly tied to exact place where the book is situated.

 

The specificity of the land and environment are in themselves something that is explored in the story. The location is also a place where certain things tend to be more noticeable, such as climate change. 

 

But on a deeper level, the book explores emotional states through setting and climate. The story is about an extreme emotional state that is understood, in part, in the context an extreme environment.

 

The isolation and iciness of the setting is central to the emotional currents of the story and what the characters, and thereby the reader, experience; environmental descriptions diffuse the writing about the characters. 

 

The setting is also important because of the way that Lee's experience of it changes. What initially seems to Lee like barren and frozen surroundings where they can more easily shut out the world eventually reveals itself to be a source of beauty, expansiveness, and meaning, a place where it's actually harder to shut out the material world.

 

Q: What impact did it have on you to write this book, and what do you hope readers take away from it?

 

A: I wrote the book, in some ways, as a healing guide for myself, as well as for the reader. While I was writing it, my best friend died. I stopped writing for months, but when I returned to the story, it helped me cope, almost as a blueprint.

 

I hope that readers find the book comforting in some way, and that it helps them understand something that either they themselves are experiencing or have experienced, or that someone they know may be going through.

 

I have been told that the book is profoundly healing even though it's a raw and unflinching look at grieving. When people are grieving or otherwise experiencing something very difficult, like illness, they can feel very alone, like everyone else is going on with their lives while they're personally stuck in a sort of frozen state.

 

Just seeing someone else acknowledge the frozen state and reach out a hand can be profoundly comforting. I've experienced finding this kind of comfort and companionship in books a few times in my life, and I hope that Ring provides that. 

 

I also hope that the story gets readers thinking and talking about some the ethical issues explored.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: Believe it or not, my next book is funny! It’s a collection of humorous stories about my life among animals, from my neurologically impaired squirrel to my physically disabled sheep to the six cats with feline leukemia I accidentally adopted.

 

I'm a Harvard-trained lawyer who practiced animal law for years, and while I was a law student I helped get the animal law program at Harvard Law School started. This memoir-in-essays about my own experiences with animals sheds light on what led me down that path. It's already finished and in the editing stage.

I've also started a historical novel about the Shakers. Most people aren’t aware how truly radical the Shakers were. They were egalitarian in terms of both gender and race. They were communist with a small “c.” Their religious leader was a woman.

 

They prohibited marriage, sex, and reproduction, and replenished their ranks by adopting orphans and raising them in the community. At the point of adulthood, they let the adoptees go out into the world and decide whether or not to remain a Shaker.

 

My story is about a young woman at this point in her life, deciding whether to remain a Shaker and have access to education, occupation, and leadership positions, or to live in the outside world and have the kind of family life afforded by marriage and childbearing.

 

I want to consider the question of what we are willing to give up in order to fulfill our potential, and what it means to choose between different kinds of freedom.

 

And in the wake of the demise of Roe v. Wade, I hope to explore the concept of women’s reproductive autonomy by considering the Shaker movement. The Shakers were started by a woman, Mother Anne, who suffered four still births and didn’t want to do that anymore.

 

The Shakers became one of the only options for women who did not want to marry or bear children, and a very large percentage of every Shaker community at any given time were women of reproductive age. I think this is a story that needs to be told right now.

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: Ring was released in paperback rather than hardback in order to be more affordable. It's also available in e-book and audiobook. The audiobook is read by talented narrator Jenny Barr. 

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb

April 21

 


 

ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY
April 21, 1923: John Mortimer born.

Friday, April 18, 2025

Q&A with Gail Crowther

 

Photo by Kevin Cummins

 

 

Gail Crowther is the author of the new book Dorothy Parker in Hollywood. Her other books include Three-Martini Afternoons at the Ritz. She lives in the UK.

 

Q: What inspired you to write Dorothy Parker in Hollywood?

 

A: I had been thinking about some of my favourite women writers, and it was while I was chatting to my agent, Carrie, that she mentioned there had never been a book that focused solely on Dorothy Parker’s years in Hollywood.

 

I realised that I had no idea just how long she spent there and the level to which she was politically involved in establishing so many key organisations such as SWG and the Hollywood Anti-Nazi League.

 

I was also straight off the back of writing about Sylvia Plath and Anne Sexton and both these writers have really detailed and exciting archives. Dorothy Parker has no archive at all so I thought the contrast would be interesting and researching her would be a real challenge — which it was.

 

Q: The writer Delia Ephron said of the book and of Parker, “This is a lesson in fame and in the destructiveness of your own demons.” What do you think of that description?

 

A: I think it is a really accurate and perception description, and I am so grateful to Delia Ephron for writing the blurb and for really understanding what the book was trying to say.

 

Ultimately Parker’s greatest demon was herself, in all sorts of different ways, both professionally and personally. Many of her problems also felt like contemporary problems too, which just goes to show that in many ways life hasn’t changed so much for women.

 

Yet Parker was tough. She made it in a man’s world, both in New York and Hollywood, something which she never seemed to give herself credit for.

 

Q: How did you research the book, and did you learn anything that especially surprised you?

 

A: I researched the book by looking into lots of secondary archives given Parker did not have her own. So, people such as Robert Benchley and Orson Welles, any archives that mentioned material from Parker. Some turned out to be no use at all and others had some gems.

 

I also trawled all the newspapers of the 1920s, ‘30s, ‘40s, and ‘50s to find interviews Parker had given to make sure I got her voice into the book.

 

But it was researched at such an odd time too – during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic when the world was in lockdown, so lots of archive material was scanned. I even had a Zoom archive visit with the University of Michigan, which was fabulous.

 

I discovered lots of things about Parker which surprised me – not least the extent of her left-wing political activism, which was an especially brave thing in those McCarthy years in Hollywood.

 

She went to Spain during the civil war, despite being terrified, and she helped to get people out of Germany after the Second World War. She spent so much time fundraising, raising awareness, campaigning and seemed to be on endless committees, as well as giving a lot of her own money away.

 

On a less grand scale, I was surprised to discover that she liked knitting!

 

Q: What are some of the most common perceptions and misconceptions about Dorothy Parker?

 

A: I suppose the most common perception about her is that she was a witty, jaunty wisecracker – and she was.

 

But she was so much more than that. I feel she never really got credit for just how many genres she was able to work across; verse, plays, short stories, and screenwriting. She was nominated for two Academy Awards for her screenwriting, something which I didn’t know before I started the book.

 

Plus, she knew there was a time and place for humour, and during the 1940s in particular, she just backed away from being the woman who always delivered a devasting one-liner, feeling there was nothing to laugh about in the world at that time.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: I have two new books to work on. The first is called Marilyn and her Books: The Literary Life of Marilyn Monroe, and will take a look at all the books in her personal library and aim to re-cast Marilyn as a serious and intelligent reader.

 

Following that I will be writing a biography of Daphne du Maurier’s novel Rebecca, looking at how the book came about and what happened when Rebecca seeped from the pages into the world at large. So once again I’ll be back writing about Hollywood and Hitchcock and Orson Welles which I’m very excited about.

 

I’ll also be considering why Rebecca has such lasting appeal given this is a novel that has never been out of print since 1938. I also aim to offer a very different, unusual reading of the book…

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: If you haven’t watched any of Dorothy Parker’s films, you should, starting with A Star is Born (1937) starring Fredric March and Janet Gaynor.

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb

Q&A with Alex Bollen

 


 

 

Alex Bollen is the author of the new book Motherdom: Breaking Free from Bad Science and Good Mother Myths. She is a researcher and is a postnatal practitioner with the NCT, which is a parenting charity in the UK.

 

Q: What inspired you to write Motherdom, and how would you define that term?

 

A: I wrote the book because I am fed up with all the guilt-inducing garbage that mothers have to put up with! In particular, I want to bust the unrealistic and contradictory Good Mother myths that can make motherhood so miserable.

 

The word “motherdom” conveys the dignity and power of mothers – the suffix “dom” means “condition, state, dignity, domain and realm.” It is my vision of a more generous and expansive concept of motherhood, which values and respects the many different ways women nurture and protect their children.

 

Q: What would you say are some of the most common perceptions and misconceptions about motherhood?

 

A: Probably the most common – and certainly the most enduring – Good Mother myth is the idea of the self-sacrificing, nurturing and happy mother.

 

This can be damaging in many ways. Women can feel there is something wrong with them if they have negative or ambivalent feelings about motherhood. Also because mothers are expected to be “naturally” selfless, maternal love and care is taken for granted.

 

A misconception which is especially prevalent today is the idea of “optimization” – that Good Mothers should do everything in their powers to optimize their kids’ development. 

 

Q: The scholar Tina Miller said of the book, “This passionately written and impeccably evidenced book reminds us of the myriad ways in which mothers are blamed for pretty much everything.” What do you think of that description?

 

A: I’m very happy with it! Tina has been researching motherhood for more than two decades and I’m a great admirer of her work.

 

Q: What do you hope readers take away from the book?

 

A: I hope readers come away from the book feeling both hopeful and angry. We don’t have to put up with these Good Mother myths! We need to focus instead on all the relationships and resources children need to flourish.  

 

I’d also like any mothers reading my book to have a greater appreciation of everything they do to love and care for their children.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: Right now, I’m in the thick of publicizing this book but have two potential book ideas that I have started working on. I just need to figure out which one to pursue…

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: I’m planning to do some book events in the US this summer, but dates and locations haven’t been sorted yet. Please follow me on Instagram (@alexbollen) if you want to find out when these are happening!

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb

Q&A with Katherine Davis-Gibbon

 




 

 

Katherine Davis-Gibbon is the author of the new children's picture book Words. She also has written the picture book My Old Friend, Then. She is the founder of Riverlet Press.

 

Q: What inspired you to write Words?

 

A: I’ve always felt an affinity for words, but my relationship with them deepened profoundly in the early months of the pandemic. I was stuck at home with two bored kids, an 8-year-old I suddenly needed to homeschool and a 3-year-old who missed her friends.

 

Amid the stress and isolation, I found myself craving the company of words and turning to them for attunement. Whenever I was reading to my kids, or if we were singing songs together, every word fully landed—which is not the case in normal life, when we’re distracted and so many simply wash over us.

 

The more attuned I became to words, the more I was able to access their power. I felt this wonderful sense of partnership, like words were coaching me through that time and reassuring me that I wasn’t alone.  

 

I wanted to share this message with kids. It’s easy for children to take words for granted, but they truly are an invaluable resource that we can lean on in so many ways.

 

They’re very good at solving problems and guiding us closer to our dreams. They naturally help us reach out to others or comfort ourselves when we are alone.

 

I wrote this book to encourage children to fearlessly engage with language, because the more willing we are to let words in, the more access we gain to their gifts. And the more value that we place on language, the more likely we are to use it with care.

 

Q: What do you think Anne Berry’s illustrations add to the book?

 

A: My intention with this book was to literally bring words to life, by creating a cast of word-characters that would straddle the line between text and illustration. It was essential to find the right illustrator, who was up for the challenge and open to collaborating closely with me on developing these imaginative characters.

 

When I saw Anne’s portfolio, I was immediately drawn to it. Her work radiates wit, charm, and tenderness, which were qualities I wanted these word-characters to have. I wanted them to be funny, relatable, and endearing to children, so that befriending them would feel organic.

 

When I reached out to Anne, we instantly clicked and dove right into the creative process. We wanted the phonetic decoding of each word-character to feel like a game or puzzle, instead of a chore, so we employed humor, novelty, bright colors, and fun prints, which we hoped would be irresistible to kids and engage them in the act of reading.

 

It was also very important to us to present as diverse a cast of characters as possible, with the hope that all children might see themselves in the book—in the child-characters, the word-characters, or better yet both!

 

We wanted each word-character to have its own personality and its own special charm, so we rehashed them many times over, adding tons of quirky details to make them idiosyncratic, like people.

 

It took us almost two years to complete all the spreads, because we poured so much of ourselves into the art, but I think and hope that we achieved our goals.


Q: What do you hope kids take away from the story?

 

A: I hope it sparks a love of language and supports their capacity to connect. For little ones especially, words can be daunting. Adults and older siblings always seem to have the upper hand when it comes to accessing vocabulary and making an argument.

 

I’d love for even the youngest children to believe that words belong to them, too, because the more of themselves they invest in language, the more that words will support them.

 

Q: What first interested you in writing children’s picture books?

 

A: I’ve always written, but I never delved into children’s work until I had kids of my own. Reading to children, which I’ve been doing for 14 years now, has been a master class on the depth, breadth, and quality of work that exists in this genre.

 

Since little ones, in particular, love being read to—and because they get attached to wonderful books—I’ve had the opportunity to reread the best of the best picture books, realistically, probably thousands of times.

 

I admire them as much as I do novels, because it takes great skill to distill a message or narrative into 32 pages, using very few words.

 

Then, pairing text with illustrations to create a vibrant visual narrative that is magical, yet still cohesive, takes more than just talent; it takes patience, diligence, and determination, too. It’s a unique challenge that I find fun to take on.

 

Another fun challenge is finding ways to innovate in a genre that is so saturated. With my work, I look to fill gaps in the market—to write the books I was wishing to find when my children were younger.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: My next children’s book is about resilience and the hidden gifts of not always getting what we want.

 

With that said, writing Words and having the opportunity to discuss it with people has raised all sorts of interesting questions around how the child of today interfaces with language. From the scourge of bullying to the post-pandemic slump to the influence of technology in our lives, experts agree that kids are struggling.

 

I’m fired up about these issues, so I have briefly pressed pause on my next children’s book to investigate them in a series of articles. I have already begun posting content at my website, www.riverletpress.com, under the resources tab, with more to come in the weeks ahead.

 

I love hearing from readers and caregivers, so if you’d like to connect, feel free to reach out to me via the contact page.

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: Earlier, I discussed the pandemic. Interestingly, what I’m gleaning from parents, pediatricians, teachers, and therapists is that the lag we’re seeing in kids’ social development had already taken root prior to 2020.

 

Other influences, such as the role that technology plays in young people’s lives, have driven them away from interacting with others: texting, gaming, shopping online—even little things, like using self-check-out lanes, instead of chatting with a cashier.

 

In isolation, none of this sounds significant, but add it together and introduce it to kids from the start of their lives, and one can appreciate the impact that all of it, collectively, has on them.

 

Another influence I think we could pay more attention to is how divided public opinion has become in this country and how frequently adults weaponize words. There’s so much noise and hostility in the air that it’s daunting for kids to find their own voice—let alone trust it.

 

I think we, as caregivers, have an opportunity to address this with very young children. By introducing language in a warmer, more positive, more nurturing way, I hope that kids will consider it sacred, and in due course treat it with care.

 

In addition to explicitly teaching children about kind, effective communication, there is also room for us, as caregivers, to self-reflect—to look at what we model for kids and how their behavior mirrors our own.   

 

Thanks for hosting me! I enjoyed answering these thoughtful questions.

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb. This Q&A was conducted in partnership with Riverlet Press. Enter this giveaway for a chance to win a copy of Words, signed by Katherine Davis-Gibbon. The grand prize winner will also take home a $10 gift card to Barnes & Noble. Don’t miss out on your chance to win!