Saturday, February 24, 2018

Q&A with Victoria Redel


Victoria Redel, photo by Marion Ettlinger
Victoria Redel is the author most recently of the novel Before Everything. Her other books include The Border of Truth and Loverboy. She is on the faculty of Sarah Lawrence College, and her work has appeared in a variety of publications, including Granta.com and Harvard Review.

Q: How did you come up with the idea for Before Everything, and for your five main characters?

A: Deborah, I had been working on another novel when my best friend since I was seven passed away. After a period of deep silence, it became clear I wanted to write about friendship, about how a community of friends through life manage each other's life changes-- death being that most final change.

The characters emerged as I began writing. I knew I wanted a gang of childhood friends with all the sweetness and complication of people knowing one another through many phases and life events. And the rest of the characters--new friends, ex-husbands, the hospice nurse--all began to emerge through the writing.

Q: Did you write the book in the order in which it appears, or did you move the sections around as you worked?

A: I wrote the book in big and small chunks and, yes, moved sections around to start to shape the book's structure. It was the way I found the rhythm overall voice of the novel.

That said, after a bit, I wrote the chunks mostly knowing where they'd fit. The more I wrote the book, the clearer it became that I wanted to give many of the characters a voice.

I saw the book as moving a bit kaleidoscopically which made it all more complicated. But hopefully it's interesting. I've always worked in a collaged style though I long to be a writer who works in a neat, linear fashion. 

Q: How was the novel’s title chosen, and what does it signify for you?

A: "Before Everything" hopefully speaks to that moment when all things are possible. That time--which perhaps doesn't ever purely exist-- when you have that deep inhale that gives strength for all that follows.

Q: What do you think the novel says about female friendships?

A: It's really all about friendship--and the strength that is woven into the way women care for one another. I believe that the women in the novel bear witness to one another's lives. Some have to learn how to accept that which they don't want to accept, primarily Anna's choice to stop treatment.

There are many women in this book and so there's room for so much--love, history, jealousy, change, physical care, fear, secrets, love. I wanted to create a big cast of complicated characters--not always likeable, often struggling, but enduring and loving. 

Q: What are you working on now? 

A: It seems I'm back to writing poems. As it's turned out after the long haul of a novel, I'm always grateful to return to making poems. I love the compression, knocking one word up against another and that the arc of a poem is brief.

I'm letting myself mess around and see what these poems are pointing to. I'm throwing out a lot of them but hopefully some will withstand the revisions.

--Interview with Deborah Kalb

Feb. 24

ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY
Feb. 24, 1943: Kent Haruf born.

Friday, February 23, 2018

Q&A with Karen Perry


Paul Perry and Karen Gillece, photo by Edmund Ross Photography
Karen Perry, the pen name of writers Karen Gillece and Paul Perry, is the author of the new novel Girl Unknown. Their other books include The Innocent Sleep and Only We Know. They are both based in Dublin. This interview was conducted with Karen Gillece.


Q: How did you come up with the idea for Girl Unknown?

A: When Paul and I were thinking about a subject for our next book, I remembered a conversation I had had in a pub many years previously. I was meeting a guy I used to work with for a catch-up. We knew each other well – I had met his wife on several occasions, he knew my boyfriend at the time.

After a couple of drinks, he let slip that he had a child from a relationship that pre-dated his marriage, a child his wife knew nothing about. It was fairly shocking news to me, but more than anything, I couldn’t help thinking that the day would eventually arrive when his child would come looking for him, and how would he explain this deception to his wife?

I lost touch with the guy not long after that, and his revelation got buried in the back of my mind. It was only when Paul and I began discussing our ideas that the memory resurfaced. It became the seed of the plot for Girl Unknown.

Q: You tell the story from the alternating perspectives of the married couple David and Caroline Connolly's alternating perspectives. Did you write the novel in the order in which it appears, or did you move things around as you wrote?

A: When we started work on the book, we initially planned to write a single narrative, looking at the story solely from David’s perspective. So the initial draft of the opening “David” chapters, starting with his first encounter with Zoe, were actually written by me.

It wasn’t until we were some way into the book that we realized that the story would be richer and more complex if we were to include Caroline’s perspective. This necessitated some reordering, as well as the creation of whole new “Caroline” chapters.

The book went through several drafts with input from our editors on both sides of the Atlantic. Ironically, the prologue was the very last thing we wrote!

Q: How do the two of you collaborate on your books? Can you describe your writing process?

A: At the heart of our writing process is conversation. We discuss the idea a lot, tossing different ideas back and forth. Once we have settled on the bones of a plot, we do some work on character.

Generally speaking, we each take a character and offer alternating perspectives with each new chapter, although this is not always the case (see above). We do a sort of relay-write, whereby we send each other our chapters as soon as they are complete.

We try to meet regularly to offer feedback. After a first draft is complete, we swap over and re-write each other’s chapters.

Q: Who are some of your favorite authors?

A: In the crime/thriller genre, I love Tana French (who also happens to be a close friend of mine). I adore Daphne du Maurier and John le Carre, and I think that Jane Harper is a terrific new talent (The Dry was my favourite thriller last year).

Outside the genre, I love Sarah Waters, Hilary Mantel, Tim Winton, Michael Chabon, Rose Tremain, William Trevor…. The list goes on and on!

Q: What are you working on now?

A: Paul and I are working on a screenplay for the movie adaptation of our first novel together: The Innocent Sleep. It’s been optioned by a terrific Irish production company called Subotica. This is our first foray into the screenplay world, and while it’s very different to novel-writing, we’re finding the process exciting and fun!

Q: Anything else we should know?

A: I think that’s about it!

--Interview with Deborah Kalb

Feb. 23

ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY
Feb. 23, 1868: W.E.B. Du Bois born.

Thursday, February 22, 2018

Q&A with Dina Gold


Dina Gold is the author of Stolen Legacy: Nazi Theft and the Quest for Justice at Krausenstrasse 17/18, Berlin. She is a senior editor at Moment magazine, and worked as a reporter and producer for the BBC. Born in London, she now lives in Washington, D.C.

Q: You write that as a child you would hear stories from your grandmother about the building in Berlin your family had owned. What ultimately made you decide to search for that building?

A: I really loved my grandmother Nellie Wolff. She would weave wonderful stories of her life in Berlin that were very tantalizing to a young girl. Nellie’s daughter, my mother, had also enjoyed a luxurious lifestyle up to the age of 11, when Hitler came to power and the family fled.

My mother always discounted Nellie’s stories. She said Nellie was a fantasist, her claims that the family had once owned a huge building were probably unfounded and that we should look to the future, not the past. I had a very different attitude. Yes, Nellie might have been mistaken but … it was also possible that perhaps she wasn’t. I absolutely had to find out!

When the Berlin Wall fell in 1989, my parents were totally set against my starting a restitution claim. Nellie had died 12 years earlier, leaving no documents or photographs relating to the building, not even its address.

My father would say, “You can't fight the German government, forget it.” The only person who supported me was my husband, Simon.

Q: How did you feel when you started doing some research and realized your grandmother’s stories could be true?

A: It was exciting and gratifying that my hunch seemed to be right.  As I started to uncover more and more evidence it started to look as if Nellie had not been telling fairy stories. I determined that I couldn’t give up!

I found the building in what had been the Soviet sector, just behind the Berlin Wall, two blocks from Checkpoint Charlie.

It might sound like an exaggeration to say that I was driven by “the burden of history…” but actually it is not.

Professor Walter Reich, former director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, wrote in a testimonial for my book: “The Holocaust - the project of exterminating Europe's Jews - was an immense act of murder. But it was also an immense act of theft. The murder was, of course, the incomparably greater crime. The dead could never be brought back to life.”

He is, of course, absolutely right.

Stolen Legacy is not directly about the genocide - which was unparalleled, unforgettable and totally unforgivable.  In a similar vein to that of the movie Woman in Gold, about the fight to reclaim a Klimt painting, Stolen Legacy is about the fight for restitution of a huge building in central Berlin.

Q: How long did your effort take to obtain restitution?

A: The case was concluded in January 1996. In round terms it took just over five years.

Q: What are some of the things that surprised you as you learned more about your family?

A: During my investigation to find enough evidence to present a legal claim, I discovered just how successful the international H. Wolff fur company had been. 

The family had tried desperately hard to hold onto the building, which had been the company headquarters. The paperwork I found revealed exactly what had happened, the process of the forced sale to the Reichsbahn (German railways), how the property had been used during the war and what the Communists did with the building when it was inside the territory of the German Democratic Republic (East Germany).

I visited the New York Public Library and discovered some old editions of a publication called “Fur Trade Review.” I looked at three years’ worth – from 1908-1910. This magazine is no longer published, but these issues offer a vivid portrayal of the once vibrant fur trade that flourished across North America in the early part of the last century. European dealers would visit the United States and establish business links here. 

To my amazement I found many H. Wolff advertisements and photos of the company’s latest designs …not only coats but also stoles, muffs, hats and assorted accessories – all made from fur. It was yet further evidence of what a prestigious fashion house it had been. 

The librarians at the New York Public Library were perfectly happy for me to take photos.

Q: In addition to the historical aspects of the story, this is a very personal book. How did you balance your roles as journalist and family member as you worked on the book?

A: It’s interesting you ask that because a colleague who read the draft said to me, “I would have written the story with much more emotion.” But I am not like that. Being gushing and sentimental is not my style. I’m trained as a journalist and to a large extent I have to put my feelings to one side.

I was haunted by the terrible discoveries I made while doing research into the fates of some of the people I wrote about. The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum and the International Tracing Service (ITS), as well as many other archives I consulted, have a wealth of material for historians.    

The Wolff family was comparatively fortunate. Not everyone in the family survived, but my grandparents, my mother and her two siblings did. I never forget that the theft of a building cannot be compared with losing family, friends and indeed entire communities.

Q: At what point did you decide to write a book about your family’s experiences?

A: I kept talking about it all through the claim. But I had a full-time job at the BBC, and three young children. Simon was working for the Financial Times and traveling extensively. I was too busy, and I just couldn’t do it.

What prompted me was that, in 2008, I left the BBC and came to the USA on a green card because my husband had been offered a job in Washington, D.C.

I brought all the case papers over. Simon said, “The children need to know their family history, so sit down and write,” and that is what I did. A friend who is a literary agent kept asking me to show her my draft. She really liked the story. And that is how the American Bar Association came to publish Stolen Legacy.

Q: You've published an updated version of your book. What new material did you research and report for the paperback?

In the course of my research, I delved into the background of the Victoria Insurance company – and its Nazi-era chairman, Dr. Kurt Hamann – which had foreclosed on the Wolff family building in 1937 and handed it straight to the Reichsbahn. 

I discovered that the Victoria Insurance, under Hamann’s leadership, was part of a consortium insuring SS slave labor workshops at Auschwitz, Buchenwald and Stutthof concentration camps. I managed to obtain the actual policy documents.

I also found out a lot more about Dr. Hamann’s career, his wartime role and how he was feted in the post war era.

I already knew that the University of Mannheim, a very prestigious German university, has a stiftung (foundation) named after Dr. Hamann!

Q: What has the impact of this new material been so far?

I asked Professor Dr. Ernst-Ludwig von Thadden, President of Mannheim University, if he considers Dr. Hamann a suitable person to be honored in such a manner. I have been in correspondence with him for the past two and a half years about what should be done.

The latest news is that a year ago, Prof. von Thadden told me that he had commissioned a renowned German historian, Prof. Johannes Baehr, to conduct an in-depth study into the life of Dr. Hamann. That report was initially due to be delivered by end August 2017. 

Prof. Baehr apparently found “more than anticipated” and suggested he would be in a position to “produce a first report before Christmas.” A decision would then be taken about the future of the Dr. Kurt-Hamann Foundation.

However, I have very recently been contacted once more by Prof. von Thadden who tells me that the report by Prof. Baehr will take more time due to “unexpected difficulties in the access to new material and the extent of the new material itself.” 

Apparently, the latest date being proposed for submission by Prof. Baehr is end March. Prof. von Thadden says he accepts that a further delay is necessary because this is an important matter and “diligence takes precedence over speed.”

Q: Anything else we should know?

A: When you last interviewed me, I told you how I had been trying to get a plaque placed on the building, explaining it was forcibly taken by the Nazis from its Jewish owners. In December 2013, on behalf of then Transport Minister Dr. Peter Ramsauer, an official e-mailed me: “I’ll arrange for the plaque to be produced and affixed to the office building.”  But nothing happened. 

In Spring 2016 the BBC, my former employer, asked me to fly to Berlin to make a short film about the story for broadcast across the UK on International Holocaust Remembrance Day the following January 27.   

I flew to Berlin in May 2016 and was met at the building by officials only too eager to help! The knowledge that a BBC film crew was coming had seemingly galvanized them into action! And that’s how, in July 2016, I managed to have a plaque put at the entrance to the building.

I have spoken in cities across the USA about the story of Stolen Legacy and everywhere I go I meet audience members who long to reclaim their own families’ stolen property all over Europe. It is a tragedy, and a scandal, that more than 70 years after the end of the war, thousands of people are still waiting for some measure of restitution.  Next month I am off to speak at a conference in Munich.

And finally … in the not too distant future there is going to be a Chinese language edition of Stolen Legacy published by the Sichuan People's Publishing House. I look forward to showing you a copy!

--Interview with Deborah Kalb. Here's a previous version of this Q&A. Dina Gold will be speaking at the Temple Sinai Authors' Roundtable in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 24.

Feb. 22

ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY
Feb. 22, 1892: Edna St. Vincent Millay born.