Monday, October 28, 2024

Q&A with Emily Schultz

 

Photo by Brian J. Davis

 

 

Emily Schultz is the author of the new novel Brooklyn Kills Me. Her other books include Sleeping with Friends. She lives in Brooklyn.

 

Q: What inspired you to write Brooklyn Kills Me, and how did you create your character Agnes?

 

A: Agnes grew out of the first book in the series, Sleeping with Friends, but I didn’t know she would go on to star in her own book when I wrote that. It was kind of an ensemble novel, a weekend murder mystery where one of the characters, Mia, has been in a coma and can only remember her life though movies.

 

Somehow introverted and queer Agnes emerged as my parlor detective, my Hercule Poirot, so to speak. I knew I wanted Brooklyn Kills Me to also be set at a party—for Agnes to have to piece together an evening’s events in order to solve the murder of her neighbor.

 

I believe getting to gather together holds more importance for us post-pandemic. I live in Brooklyn, and New York was a ghost town. But those of us who stayed throughout the pandemic got to know our neighbors very well with the close proximity.

 

Q: What do you see as the relationship between this novel and Sleeping with Friends? Should a reader begin with one before starting the other?

 

A: The novels share characters but I wanted to be sure that readers could jump straight into either book if they wanted to. There are a few references that call back, but not too many.

 

In Brooklyn Kills Me, Agnes takes center stage. I knew that I wanted to place her in a circle of power brokers, and famous New Yorkers, artists, playwrights, musicians, journalists, politicians, star chefs.


Q: Without giving anything away, did you know how the story would end before you started writing it, or did you make many changes along the way?

 

A: I did know at least some of what the ending would be. But there was a twist that even I didn’t see coming until the end of the first draft.

 

Q: How was the novel’s title chosen, and what does it signify for you?

 

A: Brooklyn Kills Me is very much a Brooklyn adventure—I’ve lived in Williamsburg and Greenpoint for almost 14 years now so it felt time to write about where I live my life and imbue them with some fictional ominousness: from Domino Park to Pete’s Candy Store.

 

The title is something I’ve said to myself on more than a few occasions.

 

Q: What do you hope readers take away from the book?

 

A: I hope readers will bond with the characters and be drawn in by the absurd situations I put them through, but more than that I always want to portray a reflection of life in Brooklyn. Wealth, class, and privilege are threads I’m always trying to untangle.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: I’m doing a lot of screenwriting—adaptations of my books and an original feature with my partner. I also have a couple different novels that I’m starting.

 

I like exploring cross-genre best, and have jumped between the genres a bit—as much as my publishers will allow—from literary thriller (Little Threats) to pure mystery (this series), to things that touch on horror, like my novel The Blondes.

 

Right now what I’m trying to decide is whether my audience will follow me if I step a bit off the beaten path. I find it interesting that there are some readers who are devoted to one kind of fiction only, and others who will read more widely. I love a challenge so I never want to write the same story twice.

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: I spent a decade running the literary journal Joyland and I recently got the bug again and started a pop culture zine on Substack called Medium Cool. The idea is that it’s for the formerly young and cool, such as myself!

 

It’s at https://www.themediumcool.com/

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb

Q&A with I.M. Aiken

 


 

 

 

I.M. Aiken is the author of the new novel The Little Ambulance War of Winchester County. Aiken lives in Vermont.

 

Q: What inspired you to write The Little Ambulance War of Winchester County, and how did you create your character Alex?

 

A: Although fiction, The Little Ambulance War came from experiences. I have been involved in public safety and government service since the age of 20. When starting, my target was something else and something more familiar, like a Tuesday night in front of the television with strong jawed characters in a dark city. That’s not the story, I had to tell myself after a draft (or two).

 

What does this life have to do with body and soul? That’s the question I had to address.

 

Like my Alex, I found myself at the age of 28 paralyzed with fear, anxiety, and pain on a trafficked road in Milwaukee confused by brake lights, traffic lights, street signs, and noise. In the novel, I put Alex in Rome.

 

I had to ask what happens to people who run towards danger, fire, brutality, crisis, and other people’s heartache. During my years as a paid and volunteer first responder, I struggled with the parochial feuds that developed between neighboring agencies.

 

Why do people with similar experience, background, needs, and dedication fight with each other on a critical scene? Even in the big cities, there are reports of firefighters pulling hoses through cop cars and physical dust-ups between human beings.

 

Alex is an insider and an outsider at the same moment, a narrative I represented with the “us” versus “them” dance heard throughout the story. Is Alex one of us? Or something/someone else?

 

That’s a pretty universal feeling, isn’t it? We never lose that existential loneliness and doubt-filled image of ourselves that we faced in high school. Each of us has heard the words and felt the impact of other human beings who offer hatred and barriers.

 

Added to this is yet another shared experience of the veteran returning from foreign wars.

 

My friend, a shepherd (plus firefighter, farmer, EMT, constable, father) still feels the shame and shunning offered to him on his return from Vietnam. As he approached 75 years of age, he had been diagnosed with a complex suite of medical suite attributed to Agent Orange.

 

And I have an entirely different experience returning from the battlefields of Iraq in my desert kit. It was late 2006 and I had been released after 330 days in-country. Silence. Utter and complete silence, except for the lovely officer at a security checkpoint in London who did me a solid so that I didn’t spent hours in legal purgatory.

 

Let’s admit, I was likely to trip a sensor that tests for chemicals on clothing and luggage. I had my U.S. government ID and my paper orders. I don’t think the security camera saw him fold the round white disk out of the way. Thanks for the one kindness on a brutal trip. Most others looked at their shoes.

 

What does a hero, a veteran, an EMT, cop, firefight feel after a lifetime of service? That became my question.

 

Q: How did your own experiences working on ambulances affect the writing of the novel, and did you need to do any additional research?

 

A: The philosopher once said: “Write what you know.” I remember the night that I came home from high school asking if I could sign up for one course at Northeastern University. During the spring term of my senior year, I drove my poo-brown Datsun B210 to a classroom and learned how to identify and treat illnesses and injuries. That decision has informed my entire life and opened many opportunities.

 

As an EMT, or cop, or firefighter, you are the being invited into the living rooms, bedrooms, basements, bathrooms, and cars of people everywhere. You walk into the lives of people on their worst days.

 

During the first days, every experience is novel and exciting and memorable and life changing. Decades later, all calls, all patients, all scene blend into a dateless, timeless, non-linear series of images and memories. I tried to represent this experience within the novel as well.

 

As for research? Kinda no, kinda yes. I thought that I would be clever and put my Alex Flynn in a world created by my father, a novelist. My research involved reading my father’s 1977 book.

 

Two things happened. First I recognized that my protagonist and his were entirely different. And two, I liked mine better. I addressed the issue by changing ages, names, and ranks. Let the reader figure it out!

 

Q: Did you know how the novel would end before you started writing it, or did you make many changes along the way?

 

A: Which draft?

 

I certainly think that when I start a novel, I know exactly where it is going. There is this point in a story that feels like the “stall” when barbecuing a beef brisket. Am I right? Is this ever going right? Will this be ok? Sometimes, you finish and call it a flop. Sometimes, I have given up before writing “the end” on the last page.

 

I have learned to inventory the best of the characters, the best scenes, the best emotions and re-assess my goals. That becomes another draft. When I turned my forthcoming novel Stolen Mountain (2025, Flare Books) over to Catalyst Press this summer, I saw that I had written six complete drafts and changed the name four times. Yet somehow it is the same book?


Q: What do you hope readers take away from the book?

 

A: I am the 9-11 generation. I was born the year after JFK promised us the moon and I sat cross-legged in a classroom watching men walk on the lunar surface via a grainy black-and-white television. My generation has lived through drugs, AIDS, domestic terrorism, international terrorism, all before we stared COVID in the face.

 

I think I want people to accept that democracy is ours, all of ours. I did not agree with the policies that sent America into Iraq, yet I served a year in Iraq as a civilian member of a military unit lending my technical expertise to a critical mission.

 

Democracy requires that we accept each other as human beings worthy of respect, love, and even reverence. There is enough tragedy, drama, trauma, and blood without thinking that we need to spill the blood more to force a change of thought, a change of personality, a change of character.

 

Let’s tear down the nonsense of “us and them.” We’re all the “us” we need. We cannot have policies and laws that separate us into neat buckets of this and that. We’re human. We’re messy, noisy, needy, loving, odd animals that need relatively little to muddle through our days: oxygen, glucose, essential minerals, a place to sit and a place to sleep. We like someone to love us and cherish us, while reciprocating that love.

 

I have seen true evil. I have been to horrific crime scenes, and I spent a year working in and around combat operations. Our battlefield was a recycled battlefield from prior wars. We don’t need to manufacture ugliness on purpose. It finds us.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: As mentioned above, the 2025 novel is called Stolen Mountain and involves two characters we met in The Little Ambulance War. The 2026 novel Captain Henry is undergoing a significant rewrite and redesign. There is another novel in the cauldron simmering over the fire.

 

In The Little Ambulance War of Winchester County, I introduced readers to Trowbridge, Vermont, and the community of first responders.

 

Instead of taking a “vertical” perspective on one character as one might find with picaresque novel, I thought I would look through the plane of characters within the community to and write something that is more “horizontal,” while remaining rooted in Trowbridge and the people there.

 

In Stolen Mountain, you can enjoy 100,000 words about Brighid Doran, EMT, and Sarah Ann Musgrave, soldier.

 

Captain Henry may yet fail, who knows, I shall keep working it. On one hand, I have Bridget researching her own ancestry.

 

She discovers a lost American hero in her great-great-great grandfather who enlisted in the U.S. Army in 1865 and then got deployed to the Reconstruction South where he did battle with the KKK, gun runners, moonshiners, and others before being deployed further west.

 

I have the written orders from the Army to one of my own ancestors, who was this guy, Captain Henry. He was a private, then a sergeant. As Brighid tells the story of her ancestor, she reads her wife’s letters from the Iraq battlefield in 2006.

 

It feels hard to write about American history at this moment. Nearly every topic in this novel feels taboo.

 

In the meantime, I am sketching a series of new characters in Trowbridge wondering what stories they have to tell me and the rest of us.

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: In late May, a bookstore opened in Somerville, Massachusetts, called “Narrative.” The owner is Mila Hossain. On her opening day, the lines stretched down Highland Avenue with people wanting to buy books. At the end of the day, she had sold almost her entire inventory. Would she be able to open on Day #2?

 

The bookstore that is hosting the pre-orders for The Little Ambulance War is called Northshire Books in Manchester, Vermont. I can’t walk though that place without bumping shoulders with people of every age. People reach for, touch, smell, and read everything in the store.

 

For someone with books spanning a century in her living room and someone raised by a family of artists and writers, this uptick of activity around books brings me joy and hope.

 

Even me, a self-identified geek, recently bought an AM/FM radio with a CD player. No matter how hard I tried I could not get streaming to feel like, behave like, and solve problems the way that owning my own media does.

 

When I buy something, I want to know that (1) I own it now and forever (2) the artist is compensated for their efforts and ownership of their intellectual property.

 

I have signed first editions. Rare books, lovely normal books by lovely everyday writers. My shelves show me a 20-year gap. Oh, I bought books, movies, and music, but I don’t own them and they don’t sit on my shelves.

 

Buy books. Buy music. Go to live concerts. Buy art from that guy on the street corner. Put a tenner in the hat of the team dancing in the park. Celebrate the young violinist sitting at the subway platform.

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb

Q&A with Clare Norman

 


 

 

Clare Norman is the author of the new book Cultivating Coachability: How to Leverage Coaching Readiness So Thinkers Can Optimise Value. Her other books include The Transformational Coach. She is the founder of Clare Norman Coaching Associates. 

 

Q: What inspired you to write Cultivating Coachability?

 

A: At my last book launch, for The Transformational Coach, one of my guests suggested I should write a book for the thinker (that’s the person being coached) to help them to get the most out of coaching.  After all, no matter how competent the coach is, if the thinker is not prepared to do the hard work of thinking, that coach’s competence will be for nothing.

 

I got to wondering how to position a book like that and realised that it’s still in the coach’s gift to influence coaching readiness and coachability, so set to work on putting my experience down on paper in that regard. 

 

The more I wrote, the more I realised that there are multiple stakeholders here, so I covered the coach’s role in adding value to all of those stakeholders, not just the thinker.

 

Q: What do you see as the relationship between a coach and a client?

 

A: Coaching is a joint endeavour to discover new thinking. It’s a partnership, where the coach creates the space within which the thinker can do their best thinking. 

 

This has historically been about tasks and performance (as sports coaching has always been), but in the last few years, this has become more about who the thinker is becoming. 


Q: What impact did it have on you to write the book?

 

A: When I write, I find out what I think. The pure act of writing gives me clarity as I tap into the unknown knowns, things that are in my unconscious because I have been doing them for so long and they have become second nature.

 

The writing also gets me to question whether the way I have always done things is really the best way.  As I rediscovered what I know, I could also experiment with new ways of being and doing. So the book is a write-up of my experiments in this field.

 

It’s by no means the finished article – there is always more to discover as I get back into a beginner’s mindset and get curious about what works and what doesn’t.

 

Q: Who do you see as the audience for the book, and what do you hope they take away from it?

 

A: The book is written for professional coaches. It is about shifting where value is created in coaching – shifting the responsibility for value creation to the thinker.

 

The responsibility of the coach is to take care of the process so that the thinker can create that value themselves, enabling them to access their inner wisdom, connect their own dots and find answers that match their personality, context, motivations, beliefs, and values.

 

Therefore, the thinker needs to be ready and willing to take that responsibility for creating value. In other words, they need to be “coaching ready.” They need to have some agency, some self-efficacy – although, of course, coaching can also support them to build agency and self-efficacy along the way.

 

The book supports the coach to cultivate coaching readiness and coachability, with the upfront input of coaching custodians.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: Related to the book, I’m pulling together a programme for coaches that is part supervision, part working group, part book-club, to enable coaches to collectively implement what they learn in the book.

 

And I’m working with the International Coaching Federation to identify how to educate coaching custodians on their role in setting up coaching for success. 

 

In other aspects of my work, I am a coach supervisor, mentor coach for International Coaching Federation credentialing and retreat leader.  And of course, I coach! Currently mostly in professional services organisations and the NHS. 

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: For those who are not coaches, here’s how you can tell whether you are coaching-ready:

https://clarenormancoachingassociates.com/how-do-you-show-up-to-coaching/

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb

Oct. 28

 


 

ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY
Oct. 28, 1903: Evelyn Waugh born.

Sunday, October 27, 2024

Q&A with Aran Shetterly

 


 

Aran Shetterly is the author of the new book Morningside: The 1979 Greensboro Massacre and the Struggle for an American City's Soul. He also has written the book The Americano. He lives in Charlottesville, Virginia.

 

Q: What inspired you to focus on the 1979 Greensboro Massacre in your new book?

 

A: In 2015, my wife and I joined my father, Robert Shetterly, in Greensboro for an exhibit of his portraits at the International Civil Rights Center and Museum.

 

The series of paintings of Americans who, throughout our history, have spoken truth to power is called Americans Who Tell the Truth and are used to start conversations about citizenship and history in schools, universities, and communities all around the country.

 

The organizer of his event said there was a couple we needed to meet while we were in town. And at a little Salvadoran cafe at the edge of Greensboro’s downtown, we spent two hours with Reverend Nelson Johnson and his wife Joyce.

 

I left that conversation with “the Nelsons” (as people affectionately refer to the couple) with the hair standing up on the back of my neck.

 

I couldn’t believe that I’d never heard about how when they and their activist comrades were struggling to build interracial unions in Greensboro’s vast textile mills and called for a march against the Klan’s racism, a caravan of Ku Klux Klansmen and neo-Nazis drove to the start of that march and began shooting, killing five labor organizers and injuring another 10.

 

How when Nelson and Joyce and other survivors of the shooting said they suspected law enforcement to have been involved somehow in the shooting, they were ostracized in Greensboro, fired from their jobs, and blamed for the deaths of their friends. How our justice system held no one criminally responsible for the shooting.

 

But how then a federal civil trial, over which the famously fair, Richmond-based Judge Robert Merhige presided, did find Klansmen, Nazis, and Greensboro police officers jointly liable for wrongful death. As far as I can tell, no such combination of co-defendants had ever been found jointly responsible for death in our country’s history.

 

But what really gave me goosebumps as I walked away from that conversation was that despite all the trauma they’ve experienced, the Johnsons could continue to fight for the rights of the poorest and most marginalized among us, radiating a positive, hopeful, and loving spirit out into the world.

 

This was before the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, before Trump said there were “fine people on both sides.” I had a feeling that immersing myself in this subject would reveal something much bigger than Greensboro, that it would teach me about who we are as Americans. And it has.


Q: How did you research the book, and what did you learn that especially surprised you?

 

A: This was not an easy project to research. The FBI investigation into the November 3, 1979, shooting was, at the time, the third biggest in Bureau history. Then there were three trials, a state murder trial, a federal civil rights trial, and a federal civil trial.

 

And then from 2004-2006 a truth and reconciliation commission (TRC) looked at the shooting and created yet another set of archives.

 

So the first challenge was the sheer volume of primary source material, from the archives at the Wilson Library at UNC-Chapel Hill, to the TRC archive at Bennett College, to the vast Digital Archive at the University of North Carolina-Greensboro, and several private archives.

 

Then a sudden Freedom of Information Act response from the FBI, late in the project, provided me with 20,000 pages of Bureau documents. I had to be smart about what characters I would focus on in the story so that I could figure out how to approach the hundreds of thousands of pages of records pertaining to this history. And that doesn’t even include all the newspaper coverage!

 

In addition to the documents, so many people connected to this history are still alive and continue to be passionate about their point of view on what happened that tragic day and what it means.

 

I didn’t want to dismiss anyone’s energy, but to listen, try to understand, and try to figure out what it meant when, for example, someone is shouting at me on the phone about why my book was a gigantic waste of time. It took me time to orient myself before that energy and be able to process it into the book.

 

Yet another challenge was the resilience of the Blue Wall of Silence. There were a few cracks in the facade, but it was impressive how, after all these years, so many police still echo a misleading narrative that covers up their failure to protect the marchers that day. And they aren’t the only ones who repeat myths and lies about the facts of the case.

 

What I learned, and what was most surprising to me, is that after nearly half a century, the narratives about November 3, 1979 still have social and political power in Greensboro. People still feel that they have to echo certain myths and falsehoods to be accepted in certain powerful city circles.

 

Q: Attorney and author Michelle Coles said of the book, “Aran Shetterly’s incredible book offers a harrowing reminder of how our justice system too often turns a blind eye to the perpetrators of racial violence while denying their victims blind justice.” What do you think of that assessment?

 

A: I think it’s true. But I would go even further. It’s very interesting how so often we not only deny victims justice, but ask them to apologize and forgive first. The victims of the Greensboro shooting have been much more reflective and have admitted their mistakes much more than any of the city officials connected to the shooting that day.

 

When the truth and reconciliation process started in Greensboro, many people wanted to skip the “truth” part and get right to “reconciliation.” But what are you reconciling if you can’t sit with the truth, or even multiple truths first?

 

We are still learning how to recover from traumas like this, from political violence like this, and we haven’t figured it out yet, in part because there’s so much resistance to even discussing this complex history.

 

Q: What do you see as the legacy today of the Greensboro Massacre?

 

A: Things changed in Greensboro because of the massacre. After the shooting, the city adopted a district system for voting in city councilors. This meant that in a 70 percent white city, the council became quickly more diverse and representative of its residents.

 

But I think part of the legacy is also a warning. We like to think that our society is becoming progressively more equal and enlightened. That our institutions inevitably bend toward justice. But this event happened in 1979, well after Jim Crow and the passage of the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts. It tells us that bad ideas and resistance to good ideas continue.

 

We have to be vigilant because we can move both backwards and forwards. Our present moment is fraught with this possibility.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: I’m at the very early stages of a project that, I hope, will reframe the conversation about relations between the United States and Mexico. It’s a dramatic, untold story and I’m excited to dig in when I have the chance.

 

It’s a return to Latin America for me. My first book, The Americano: Fighting with Castro for Cuba’s Future, was about the Cuban Revolution.

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: I hope that people will read Morningside as, in part, the story of a courageous quest. Nelson and Joyce Johnson are the seekers in this story, looking for the key to unlock deeper democracy and equality in our society.

 

And I hope that people will begin to see Greensboro as an essential and too often overlooked laboratory for Black Power and social justice.

 

But mostly, I hope that they become immersed in a book that I spent a long time crafting to read like a novel.

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb

Q&A with Anthony Walton

 


 

 

 

Anthony Walton is the author of the new book The End of Respectability: Notes of a Black American Reckoning with His Life and His Nation. His other books include Mississippi: An American Journey. Also a poet, he teaches at Bowdoin College.

 

Q: What inspired you to write The End of Respectability?

 

A: The last several years, as a person in middle age, I have been thinking about and taking stock of my life.

 

I was born into the Civil Rights Movement, and as such I’ve seen a lot of change in American society—the internet, smartphones, social media, the sexual revolution, to name several catalysts—and I have experienced much of what has gone right for African Americans since World War II.

 

I have also been face to face with much that has gone wrong for us. This book is a meditation on our society through the lens of my experience, which is, by definition, African American experience.

 

At the same time I have to remember (and encourage everyone else to remember) that African American experience is American experience. The two cannot be separated, they are “both/and.” So, I’m taking stock of the United States as a nation, and as an idea, or myth vis-à-vis what I have personally witnessed and carefully studied.

 

Where are we now? How did we get here? How has living in a Black body affected my experience of life and of my self? What are some of the realities, old and new, that I perceive as affecting those questions, both personally and, more broadly, as a society?

 

I hope I have answered a few of those questions, or at least identified and framed questions (old and new) in ways that are true, salient, and useful.


Q: How was the book’s title chosen, and what does it signify for you?

 

A: The book is named after one of the essays, “The End of Respectability.”

 

Much of my thinking is framed in the context of my parents’ lives. They were born into the Great Depression in Mississippi, had difficult childhoods, came north to Chicago, and steadily worked themselves into positions of traditional American homeowning suburban economic security.

 

They served as models for and supported their nuclear and extended families. They were valiant members of their community, serving in church, in clubs, in the military, and in local politics; they developed loving, trusting relationships with their neighbors.

 

They were stalwart members of our local Black community and also developed authentic and warm friendships with white neighbors, coworkers, and others with similar interests (such as Little League and Boy Scouts).

 

But for all that, they and millions of others of Blacks in their generation who had worked so hard to be a part of American civic life found that large majorities of whites embraced the overt racial disdain and backward-looking attitudes of MAGA and other retrograde political movements to the point of electing an avatar of that attitude as president of the United States.

 

This was disorienting. I think my father in particular was dismayed by this turn at the end of his life. What had all their striving and achievement been for? Quite a lot, I would say, but maybe not enough? And maybe it would never be?

 

One path of being an African American, and the one I was raised in, was—in simplest terms—the path of MLK: working to be judged by “the content of your character,” trying to participate in the accepted economic and social norms of American society, and fitting in.

 

It has been thought that that path, being “respectable,” would be the best way to become, after Civil Rights, full Americans. And in some ways that has worked. There have been all kinds of visible and measurable gains for American Blacks.

 

But it has not been enough. There have been observably large numbers of whites who resist African American progress, whether the quiet resistance we see in continued school and housing segregation, or the unapologetic and unmasked racism we see in far-right white nationalist, Christian nationalist, white supremacist, and neo-Nazi groups that are pressing for ever-larger presences in our politics and media.

 

So, it would seem that being merely “respectable” has not been enough and will not be. African Americans and those who care about them and our society are going to have to contemplate ways of being that meet the measure of the current challenges.  

 

Q: The writer Molly Jong-Fast said of the book, “Essential reading for anyone who wants to understand the complications of racism and its effects on political polarization in America today. Anthony Walton is a teller of difficult truths, and you cannot read this book without finding that it has given you new knowledge about your own life.” What do you think of that assessment?

 

A: I am very thankful to her for her kind words.

 

Q: What do you see looking ahead when it comes to racial equality in this country?

 

A: First of all, I would say time. I used to think that these problems would be eased the old-fashioned way, which is to say through the passing of generations, but we now see that racial animus has taken firm hold in certain factions of the millennial and Gen Z populations, and is probably here to stay for the foreseeable future.

 

But if I could wave a magic wand, the first thing I would do is rebuild the public school, community and technical college, and university systems, especially in urban and rural areas, to enable those young citizens to have the career and civic skills necessary to participate fully in our society.

 

I would also want to ensure that the curriculum engaged the entire history of the country, warts and all, perhaps as a model and celebration of democratic problem-solving.

 

An informed and intellectually skilled populace would probably be able to work its way toward equitable solutions for misinformation, negative speech, social media, and campaign finance, issues that I think threaten our nation.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: Right now I am working on a couple of poetry manuscripts--one finished, another almost. And you can look for my poems in The New Yorker.

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb

Q&A with Cornelia Maude Spelman

 


 

 

Cornelia Maude Spelman is the author of the new memoir Solace. Her other books include the memoir Missing. She is also an artist and a former therapist. 

 

Q: What inspired you to write this new memoir?

 

A: I wanted to share all that I have learned in my two-years-from-80 life about mothering, marriage, friendship, writing, and sobriety, and my realization that deep listening to others’ pain and talking of our own brings about healing.

 

Q: How would you compare this memoir to your previous memoir, Missing?

 

A: In my previous memoir, Missing, I sought to understand the pain that my own mother never was able to share, and how I realized that I had inherited that emotional legacy and did not want to pass it on to my own children.


Q: The writer Naomi Shihab Nye said of the book, “I admire deeply what I have always loved about Spelman’s writing- her willingness to tell an honest story, create moods, then gaze thoughtfully into them, weighing what one does next, or figuring out how it all goes together.” What do you think of that description?

 

A: Naomi’s lovely comment could be a description of all that I have learned from writing a daily diary for over 40 years, because those qualities of honesty, thoughtfulness, and weighing what to do next have become a way of life.  I was glad that she named that.

 

Q: What do you hope readers take away from the book?

 

A: I want readers to be able to say, “Oh! I, too, have felt that way!” and be comforted by our connection as human beings and especially as women.

 

Q: What are you working on now?

 

A: I continue to write my daily diary (in Clairefontaine notebooks which have such nice paper for my fountain pen) every morning with a cup of tea, and am putting together a collection of essays tentatively titled Here in My Somewhere.

 

Q: Anything else we should know?

 

A: Diary writing is my listening friend, my counselor, my lamp, my solace. 

 

--Interview with Deborah Kalb. Here's a previous Q&A with Cornelia Maude Spelman.