Helen Rappaport, photo by Stephen Bristow |
Helen Rappaport is the author of the new book The Romanov Sisters: The Lost Lives of the Daughters of Nicholas and Alexandra. Her other books include The Last Days of the Romanovs, A Magnificent Obsession, and Beautiful For Ever. She lives in Dorset, England.
Q: What are some of the greatest misperceptions about the
Romanov sisters, and what surprised you most as you researched the book?
A: I'm not sure one can talk of “misperceptions” per se,
it's more a matter of a general lack of knowledge about them. Until now the
sisters have always been an adjunct to the bigger story of their parents and
there was so little known about them.
People still, generally, are only are aware of the
superficial details: that they were young, lovely, charming but essentially
rather dull and uninteresting. Aside from the extrovert Anastasia the girls
were indeed essentially very modest, even private about themselves and their
feelings so people knew little about them.
It took a lot of hard work and searching to go beyond that
bland image and find out what they were really like, but even then one will
never entirely know, as they were always so circumspect in their letters and
diaries.
I don't think “surprise” is the right word to describe what
I found out during the research. There are no shock revelations, no
scandals, no hidden secrets -- it was more a growing sense of pleasure at
getting to know the sisters through lots of telling details. By the end they
felt like my own daughters.
It was a growing sense of love and understanding,
culminating in an overall sense of four very distinct and different
personalities behind the traditional view of them as a bland collective.
Q: You describe the family as affected by "a fatal
excess of mother love." Why was that, and how did it affect them?
A: Well, the fatal excess of mother love was of course
Alexandra's for Alexey. It was her obsession with Alexey, of protecting
him from harm and making him well again when he was sick that made her fatally
vulnerable -- it opened the door to a series of mystics, quacks and
healers, culminating in Rasputin.
This in turn was irrevocably damaging to Alexandra's
reputation as tsaritsa and her refusal to disassociate from Rasputin ultimately
led to a massive swell of public opinion against her. It even extended to her
own family, with several members of the Romanov clan plotting to have her
removed from power during the war years.
Mother love drove Alexandra so remorselessly --
irrationally even -- that I do believe it largely contributed to her own
downfall, and that of the family.
Q: You've written many books about Russian and European
history. Are there any of the historical figures you've studied who have
intrigued you perhaps more than the rest, and why?
A: Well, I don't write about any subjects unless they
challenge and intrigue me -- see for example Lenin, who for me as a female and
non-academic author, was a huge challenge. What fascinates me about Lenin
is how he is still perceived in some ways as “the good guy” of the revolution
when in fact he was as ruthless, cruel and amoral as all the others!
I’ve always found Queen Victoria endlessly
fascinating.
But I am also drawn to people from the footnotes -- unknown
people whose stories have never been told. For example, I have a
particular fascination with my Victorian con-artist and fraudster, Madame
Rachel of Bond Street -- the subject of my book Beautiful For Ever. Her story
took a huge amount of work to winkle out, as it had been lost to history.
But again, the more a subject eludes me, the more I try
to chase them down. I love the whole process of research and detection and
winkling away at the truth.
Q: As someone who's worked as an actor and a writer, how do
the two professions complement each other?
A: Having been an actor certainly is a huge bonus in terms
of public speaking and giving author talks. I feel very comfortable up there on
the podium and really enjoy it.
It's very important for an author to really communicate with
their audience and I work hard to make my talks interesting and engaging. And
of course the one compliment I always get is that people can always hear me as
I project my voice well!
But acting also taught me, instinctively I think, to
look at every book I write as a scenario, to write history as a story that is
as gripping and engaging as any novel, but of course without making it
up. I always have a very strong visual and narrative sense with every
book I write and think the narrative has to be dynamic and well constructed, as
any film script might be.
Q: What are you working on now?
A: A project I have long been planning, which is tie-in book
for the 100th anniversary of the Russian Revolution in 2017. It will
focus tightly -- that scenario approach again! -- on events in Petrograd that
year, as seen through the eyes of the many British and American eyewitnesses
who were in the city.
But it isn't all about John Reed! I have a whole cast
of wonderful and largely unknown characters whose fascinating testimony will be
totally new to readers.
Q: Anything else we should know?
A: Only that I hope very very much to finally make it over
to the USA, maybe next year, to meet some of my American readers. I would love
to give some book talks on the U.S. lecture circuit.
--Interview with Deborah Kalb
Fascinating to learn what Helen Rappaport is up to. Her tireless energy and intellectual curiosity produces entertaining and informative works. I am a big fan of her books and wish her all success with The Romanov Sisters.
ReplyDelete