Rita Gabis, photo by Rina Castelnuovo |
Rita Gabis is the author of the book A Guest at the Shooters' Banquet: My Grandfather's SS Past, My Jewish Family, A Search for the Truth. It looks at her family--part Lithuanian Catholic and part Eastern European Jewish--with a focus on her Lithuanian maternal grandfather's role during World War II. Her other books include the poetry collection The Wild Field, and her work has appeared in a variety of publications, including Harvard Review and Poetry. She lives in New York City.
Q: Why did you decide to write A Guest at the Shooters' Banquet, and as you were
working on it, how did you separate your roles as author and family member?
A: When I first found out my grandfather was a collaborator
of some sort--I didn’t know the extent for some time--the first thought I had
was to find out if he was complicit in the death of anyone, had he hurt anyone.
I had no idea I was going to write a book about it.
Six months into the research, when I began finding a paper
trail [on] his story as a collaborator, [I saw that] what occurred in the
border region of Lithuania had a meaning beyond the family story…
I knew I was going to do original research, and my aim was
to write a book that would be useful for someone outside the field, who wouldn’t
normally be going to the archives…but would be interested in the topic.
Then, in terms of separating the writer and the family
member, I spent five years going back and forth between Eastern Europe and
Israel. I also spent time in Poland and Germany. I spent time interviewing
people. When I was in the field, it was easy to put that [writer] hat on.
At each meeting with interviewees, I quickly identified
myself as being the product of a blended family, and explained what initiated
the project, and there was a moment when I held my breath and [expected the
person] would ask me to leave, but they never did.
When I interviewed family members in the U.S., it was much
more complicated. I was speaking to them as a [relative] and also as a writer…
Q: How difficult was emotionally it to learn some of the
things about your family that you uncovered in the book, and how did you
process this?
A: [In the Poligon massacre in Lithuania] in late
September-early October of 1941, 8,000 Jews were massacred. I have been to the
shooting site many times now…my grandfather’s office as chief security police
for the region is six and a half kilometers from the site. The idea of
proximity is very haunting to me.
To protect myself so I could continue to work, and because I
wanted to document very carefully, I set aside some of my emotional reactions
in the search for documentation, and transferred my energy over [to that]. But
there were a lot of sleepless nights.
I had clear memories of my grandfather, as a young person. Thinking
of how we can know one part of a person, and it was through a child’s eyes, and
all we don’t know about someone…In wartime, people can stand in a bloodbath and
then change their clothes, fill out a form, shed that life—it’s particularly
horrifying to me.
Q: How much did you know as a child about your family’s history?
A: In my childhood, the matriarch was my Jewish grandmother.
It was in her orbit that I circled. Much of the family lore came from her, and
it had to do with her father, who immigrated [from Eastern Europe], took his
family to London and Philadelphia. He lived a cloistered existence, but he was
a very successful businessman.
On the Lithuanian Catholic side, my grandfather was a hero.
He was a rabid anti-Communist. I had gotten a hint of his anti-Semitism, though
I was too young to know what it was.
I heard he had been in the forest, had fought the Soviets
who had occupied Lithuania, and had saved the children. We thought he’d lost
his wife permanently—she was arrested, put in a death cell and tortured, and
sent to a labor camp in the Gulag. That added to the sense of heroism and
victory of that side of the family.
As I got older, I knew there was more, and I didn’t want to
look at it. In the book I tell the story [of hearing author Daniel Mendelsohn
lead a discussion group]. He was talking about Lithuanian collaborators during
the war, and he said the Lithuanians were the worst. I got up from the table
and started doing dishes. I knew there was a door there but I wasn’t ready to
open it yet.
Q: The book jumps back and forth in time. Did you plot out
the structure or did it develop as you wrote?
A: I did not plot out that structure. For a long time I had
no idea how I was going to structure the book. I knew I didn’t want to split
the book in two, half the events of the war and half my attempts to research
it.
I felt ultimately I wanted the structure to remain faithful
to my own experience of trying to understand that history and that place. I
felt the book was like a series of doors, trap doors for me. I would get a
lead, or snap a photograph, and would hit a dead end. Then I’d find new
interviewees and a new piece of the past would open up.
When I said I wasn’t ready to open that door, I feel
chagrined and embarrassed. I wish I had been braver and had opened the door
earlier. I think whatever it takes to do that, I didn’t have until a certain
point. After my dad died, I had [to do] something to honor him.
Q: What are you working on now?
A: I have several projects I’m involved in, and one may
morph into a book. I’m not exactly sure.
To my surprise, I’ve ended up traveling since the fall with
this project. I haven’t had a lot of time to consider what happens next. The
material and the issues this book brought up have stayed with me, and the next
project will be a continuation of this…
Q: Anything else we should know?
A: As I’ve been traveling and giving talks, I’ve been so moved
by the questions and comments audience members have made, people doing their
own searches, puzzling out their own sense of history and family. It’s one of
the most rewarding things about having published this book.
--Interview with Deborah Kalb
No comments:
Post a Comment