Matt Bai is the author of the new book All the Truth Is Out: The Week Politics Went Tabloid. Bai, the national political columnist for Yahoo News, previously worked as chief political correspondent for The New York Times Magazine. He also has written The Argument. He lives in Bethesda, Maryland.
Q: What about Gary Hart and his political journey first captured your attention, and why did you subsequently decide to write this book about his impact on politics?
Q: What about Gary Hart and his political journey first captured your attention, and why did you subsequently decide to write this book about his impact on politics?
A: This is a journey that began for me back in 2002, believe
it or not, when I had just started writing for The New York Times Magazine.
I noticed a small newspaper item about Hart considering a
comeback and another presidential campaign, and I thought, "Why would a
guy who's been so thoroughly humiliated put himself through that?" So I
went out to see Hart, and I wrote a piece that everyone seemed to like a lot.
But somehow I started to feel like there was something I'd
missed, something deeper that connected Hart's moment to ours. For many years
after, as I covered two more presidential campaigns where we learned almost
nothing about the candidates and their plans, I just couldn't get Hart's story
out of my mind. And here we are.
Q: You write of your generation of political reporters, “The
truth was harder to admit: most of the time, we had no real access, and we
really didn’t know anything about the candidates personally you couldn’t have
learned from browsing their websites or watching speeches on YouTube.” How does
this differ from the experiences of the previous generation of reporters, and
what do you think the next generation’s experience will be?
A: Well, you always tend to idealize what came before, so I
wouldn't want to exaggerate the difference. But certainly reporters in the era
before Hart, and before I started writing about politics, had deeper, more
genuine relationships with their subjects.
That wasn't always good, and some people would say that was
too much coziness for the nation's good. But those reporters had the benefit of
context. When you know a guy, when you've heard him share his genuine
convictions in a private conversation, then you know when he's said something
truly disingenuous or has merely misspoken because he's exhausted. You don't
get these overhyped gaffes like "I invented the Internet" or
whatever.
I don't know what it will be like for the next generation.
The technology that's changing everything in the society has real potential for
political reporting, too. I know a few younger national politicians who will
simply shoot me an email or text when they have something interesting to share
or some complaint to register. You can build up some trust that way.
Q: You discuss Hart’s unwillingness to discuss the events
surrounding his dealings with Donna Rice. How does his decision compare to
those of politicians caught in more recent political scandals?
A: Night and day, is the short answer. For at least a decade
probably, Hart could have ended his political exile by writing some
confessional, or unburdening himself to Oprah, or hiring some PR firm to
launder his image. He never even took the calls from people asking for those
things.
He believed then, as he believed in the moment and still
believes now, that what he did in his home and in his private time was nobody's
business, and that talking about it had ramifications for every other
politician. He believed he had a responsibility not to legitimize that kind of
reporting.
He also believed, erroneously, that if he just stayed on the
sidelines and wrote some very thoughtful books and articles about current
affairs, everyone would forget about the tawdry stuff.
Contrast that with, say, Mark Sanford, who just posted a
2,300-word soliloquy on Facebook, explaining in excruciating detail his legal
struggles with his ex-wife, so as to win the battle of public opinion. I leave
it to you to decide which approach says more for a man's character.
Q: How was your book’s title selected?
A: Great question! The title comes from a W.B. Yeats poem
called "To a Friend Whose Work Has Come to Nothing." Hart recited it
to Martin O'Malley, now the governor of Maryland, at a low moment in 1988, and
O'Malley recited it to me.
Initially I wanted to call the book "Troublesome
Gulch," which is where the Harts have lived all these years and is also
the title of the first chapter, but most people, including my editor, thought
that sounded a little too esoteric, I guess.
Then my wife, who was trained as a medievalist and has a
great literary mind, suggested I look again at the poem. And that first line
just jumped out at me.
Q: What are you working on now?
A: Can't I get through this one first? Are you trying to
kill me? Actually, I'm writing my Thursday political column for Yahoo News,
which is a very exciting place to be right now, and getting ready to do a book
tour.
I've also been working with a friend of mine in L.A. on a
movie version of the book, and we're now writing an unrelated TV miniseries for
FX. Pus I'm getting my kids off to school in the morning. So I expect there
will be another book in my future, but I'm not sure when or what it will
be.
Q: Anything else we should know?
A: You know, my hope for this book is that it won't get
pigeonholed as a political work. I believe very strongly that there's no reason
political subjects can't be human and gripping and moving, in the way that
other nonfiction narratives can be, whether they're about sports figures or
business mergers or whatever.
So I want people like me, who love to read literary
nonfiction, to know that All the Truth Is Out is more universal and
more narrative than what you'll generally find on the political table. What
we've found so far is that once people open the book, they don't easily [put]
it down, and that's all you can ask.
--Interview with Deborah Kalb
No comments:
Post a Comment