Pamela D. Toler is the author of the new book Heroines of Mercy Street: The Real Nurses of the Civil War. It is a companion to the PBS series Mercy Street. She also has written Mankind: The Story of All of Us and The Everything Guide to Understanding Socialism, as well as a biography for kids, Matt Damon. She has a Ph.D. in history, and she lives in Chicago.
Q:
How did you end up writing this companion to the PBS series Mercy Street?
A:
The simple answer is that they asked me to.
PBS
was looking for a writer to produce a work of historical non-fiction as a
companion to their new historical drama about Civil War nurses. A book packager
I had worked with before recommended me based on my track record on a previous
project.
But
at some level that's just the mechanics of publishing. The fact is that this
project appealed to my history-nerd roots in very fundamental ways.
I've
been fascinated for a long time with the roles women play in war and how those
roles are rooted in and occasionally help change a society's fundamental
beliefs about women.
Q:
You begin the book with Dorothea Dix. Why did you start with her, and what do
you see as her legacy today?
A:
Many women were personally interested in volunteering to help the war effort,
on both sides of the conflict. Dix had a larger vision: she proposed the
creation of a corps of army nurses based on Florence Nightingale's successes in
the Crimean War.
As
the Superintendent of Women Nurses, Dix appointed more than three thousand
nurses, roughly 15 percent of the total who served with the Union army and more
than any other person or organization involved with nursing in the Civil War.
The
question of Dix's legacy is more complicated. Dix was a very successful
reformer. She knew how to inspire others to action. But she wasn't good at running an
organization. She treated the nursing corps as a web of personal relationships
with herself at the center.
George
Templeton Strong, treasurer of the United States Sanitary Commission and
definitely not a Dix fan, wrote what I think is an accurate description of her
personality and work style: "[Dorothea Dix] is energetic, benevolent,
unselfish and a mild case of monomania; working on her own hook, she does good,
but no one can cooperate with her for [she] belongs to the class of comets, and
can be subdued into relations with no system whatever."
Ultimately,
I think we should accept Dix's own assessment of her career, which was that her
service in the Civil War was a footnote to her real work as a reformer.
Q:
You write, "Nursing as a skilled profession barely existed in the
mid-nineteenth century, with the exception of a few religious orders." How
was the profession affected by the Civil War, and how many nurses worked during
that period?
A:
For the most part, nursing for pay, especially nursing in a hospital, was not
considered a job for respectable women in the mid-19th century.
In
fact, most women had some domestic experience of nursing. Most women of the
time could expect to take care of an ailing family member or neighbor at some
point in their lives.
Beyond
this common experience of domestic nursing, a few women worked as private
nurses for well-to-do families—they were basically temporary domestic servants
who performed the same services a family member might perform in a less wealthy
home.
It
was a large step down the social scale from private nurses to the women who
worked as hospital nurses, due in part to the nature of the hospitals
themselves. For the most part, hospitals were charity institutions—Bellevue in
New York City was also known as the Almshouse hospital. They existed only in the largest
cities.
Even
in large cities, female family members attended the ill at home if at all
possible. Only the poor and the desperate went to a hospital when they were
ill.
Not
surprisingly, women who were willing to work as hospital nurses typically as
desperate as their patients. Hospital nursing was a job for women who had few
options left.
For
example, at Bellevue Hospital in New York, the nurses were for the most part
"ten-day women." These were women who were arrested for public
drunkenness or disorderly conduct were sentenced to 10 days in the workhouse. Once
they sobered up, these “ten-day” women could be paroled if they agreed to work
as nurses in the Bellevue wards for a month.
British
nursing advocate Florence Nightingale summed up the public perception of hospital
nurses, describing them as women “who were too old, too weak, too drunken, too
dirty, too stolid or too bad to do anything else."
Nightingale
herself was responsible for a gradual change in the reputation of hospital
nursing that had begun only a few years before the Civil War, thanks to her
ground- breaking work in the Crimean War in 1854 and the publication of the
best-selling Notes on Nursing in 1859.
Her
career and her advocacy of nursing as a vocation caught the public imagination
in the United States as well as in Great Britain. American women read her book
and were inspired by her vision. When
the Civil War brought a need for nursing there were women who were eager to
follow her example.
By
one estimate, more than 20,000 women served as nurses during the war. Their
collective experience convinced Americans of the need for skilled nurses.
In
1868, the American Medical Association, then a relatively new organization,
recommended that general hospitals open schools to train nurses. By 1880, there
were a total of 15 nursing schools in the United States; by 1900 there were
432.
Q:
What are you working on now?
A:
I'm writing a history of architecture aimed at high school students.
Q:
Anything else we should know?
A:
I think the most important part of the story of Civil War nurses is what they
did after the war. Many of them used their new experience at organizing and at
elbowing their way through hostile bureaucracies to make their world a better
place.
If
you look at any reform movement in the last half of the 19th century, you'll
probably find a former Civil War nurse or two involved. Or in charge.
--Interview with Deborah Kalb
No comments:
Post a Comment